Skip to main content

Partial Alphabetic Trees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1732 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2461))

Abstract

In the partial alphabetic tree problem we are given a multiset of nonnegative weights W = w 1, . . . , w n , partitioned into kn blocks B 1, . . . , B k. We want to find a binary tree T where the elements of W resides in its leaves such that if we traverse the leaves from left to right then all leaves of B i precede all leaves of B j for every i < j. Furthermore among all such trees, T has to minimize ∑ in =1 wid(wi), where d(wi) is the depth of wiin T. The partial alphabetic tree problem generalizes the problem of finding a Huffman tree over T (there is only one block) and the problem of finding a minimum cost alphabetic tree over W ( each block consists of a single item). This fundamental problem arises when we want to find an optimal search tree over a set of items which may have equal keys and when we want to find an optimal binary code for a set of items with known frequencies, such that we have a lexicographic restriction for some of the codewords. Our main result is a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm that finds the optimal tree. Our algorithm runs in O(W sum/W min) log(W sum/W min)n 2) time where W sum= ∑ in =1 wi, W min= mini wi, and α = 1/log ∅ 1.44 1. I n particular the running time is polynomial in case the weights are bounded by a polynomial of n. To bound the running time of our algorithm we prove an upper bound of ⌊α log(W sum/W min) + 1⌋ on the depth of the optimal tree.

Our algorithm relies on a solution to what we call the layered Hu.- man forest problem which is of independent interest. In the layered Huffman forest problem we are given an unordered multiset of weights W = w 1, . . . , w n, and a multiset of integers D = d 1, . . . , d m. We look for a forest F with m trees, T 1, . . . , T m, where the weights in W correspond to the leaves of F, that minimizes ∑ in =1 widF(wi) where dF(wi) is the depth of wiin its tree plus dj if wiTj. Our algorithm for this problem runs in O(kn 2) time.

∅ = √5+12 1.618 is the golden ratio

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Abiteboul, H. Kaplan, and T. Milo. Compact labeling schemes for ancestor queries. In 12 th Annual ACM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 547–556, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Abrahams. Code and parse trees for lossless source encoding, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Alstrup, C. Gavoille, H. Kaplan, and T. Rauhe. Identifying nearest common ancestors in a distributed environment. unpublished manuscript, july 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Alstrup and T. Rauhe. Improved labeling scheme for ancestor queries. In Proc. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), (to appear) January 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.M. Garsia and M. L. Wachs. A new algorithm for minimum cost binary trees. SIAM J. Comput, 6(4):622–642, Dec 1977.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. E.N. Gilbert and E. F. Moore. Variable-length binary encodings. Bell System Technical Journal, 38:933–967, July 1959.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. T.C. Hu, D. J. Kleitman, and J. K. Tamaki. Binary trees optimum under various criteria. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 37(2):514–532, October 1979.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. T.C. Hu and C. Tacker. Optimum computer search trees. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 21:514–532, 1971.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. D.A. Huffman. A method for the construction of minimum-redundancy codes. In Proc IRE, 40, pages 1098–1101, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Kaplan, T. Milo, and R. Shabo. A comparison of labeling schemes for ancestor queries. In Proc. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), (to appear) January 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marek Karpinski, Lawrence L. Larmore, and Wojciech Rytter. Correctness of constructing optimal alphabetic trees revisited. Theoretical Computer Science, 180(1/2-2):309–324, June 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. G.O.H. Katona and T.O.H. Nemetz. Huffman codes and self information. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, IT-22(3):337–340, May 1976.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. D. E. Knuth. Optimum binary search trees. Acta Infomatica, 1:14–25, 1971.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Thorup and U. Zwick. Compact routing schemes. In 13 th ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barkan, A., Kaplan, H. (2002). Partial Alphabetic Trees. In: Möhring, R., Raman, R. (eds) Algorithms — ESA 2002. ESA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2461. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44180-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45749-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics