Advertisement

Overload Behaviour and Protection of Event-Driven Web Servers

  • Thiemo Voigt
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2376)

Abstract

Web servers need to be protected from overload, since server overload can lead to low server throughput and high response times experienced by clients. Most architectures for overload protection have been developed for the Apache web server. Event-driven web servers handle many more simultaneous connections than the Apache server. Thus, they exhibit a different behaviour during server overload. In this paper, we study the behaviour of event-driven servers during overload. We show that an overload protection architecture that we developed earlier successfully protects event-driven web servers from overload.

Keywords

web server event-driven overload protection admission control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ACME Laboratories: thttpd, http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd
  2. 2.
    Banga G., Druschel P.: Measuring the Capacity of a Web Server. Usenix Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barford P., Crovella M.: Generating Representative Web Workloads for Network and Server Performance Evaluation. Proc. of SIGMETRICS (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhatti N., Friedrich R.: Web Server Support for Tiered Services. IEEE Network (1999) 36–43Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhoj P., Ramanathan S., Singhal S.: Web2K: Bringing QoS to Web Servers. Tech Report: HPL-2000-61 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boland M.: Mathopd, http://mathop.diva.nl
  7. 7.
    Challenger J., Dantzig P., Iyengar A.: A Scalable and Highly Available System for Serving Dynamic Data at Frequently Accessed Web Sites. Proc. of ACM/IEEE SC 98 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doolittle L., Nelson J.: Boa Webserver, http://www.boa.org
  9. 9.
    Lu C., Abdelzaher T., Stankovic J., Son S.: A Feedback Control Approach for Guaranteeing Relative Delays in Web Servers. Real-Time Technology and Application Symposium (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manley S., Seltzer M.: Web Facts and Fantasy. Usenix Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nahum E., Rosu M., Seshan S., Almeida J.: The Effects of Wide-Area Conditions on WWW Server Performance. Proc. of ACM Sigmetrics Conference on Measuring and Modeling of Computer Systems (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mindcraft: Webstone, http://www.mindcraft.com
  13. 13.
    Paj V., Druschel P., and Zwaenepoel W.: Flash: An Efficient and Portable Web Server. Proc. of Usenix Annual Technical Conference, June 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pradhan P., Tewari R., Sahu S., Chandra C., Shenoy P.: An Observation-based Approach Towards Self-managing Web Servers. Int. Workshop on Quality of Service (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Voigt T., Tewari R., Freimuth D., Mehra A.: Kernel Mechanisms for Service Differentiation in Overloaded Web Servers. Usenix Annual Technical Conference (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Voigt T., Gunningberg P.: Handling Multiple Bottlenecks in Web Servers Using Adaptive Inbound Controls. Int. Workshop on Protocols for High-Speed Networks (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zeus Web Server, http://www.zeus.co.uk

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thiemo Voigt
    • 1
  1. 1.SICSKistaSweden

Personalised recommendations