Skip to main content

Lexicalized Proof-Nets and TAGs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics (LACL 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2014))

  • 234 Accesses

Abstract

First introduced by [12], pomset linear logic can deal with linguistic aspects by inducing a partial order on words. [9] uses this property: it defines modules (or partial proof-nets) which consist in entries for words, describing both the category of the word and its behavior when interacting with other words. Then the natural question of comparing the generative power of such grammars with Tree Adjoining Grammars [7], as [6] pointed some links out, arises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abeillé, A. Les nouvelles syntaxes. Armand Colin Éditeur, Paris, Armand Colin Éditeur, 103, boulevard St-Michel-75240 Paris, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abrusci, V. M. Non-commutative proof nets. In Girard, J.-Y., Y. Lafont, and L. Regnier, editors, Advances in Linear Logic, pages 271–296. Cambridge University Press, 1995. Proceedings of the Workshop on Linear Logic, Ithaca, New York, June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abrusci, V. M., C. Fouqueré, and J. Vauzeilles. Tree adjoining grammars in non-commutative linear logic. In Retoré, C., editor, LACL’96, volume 1328 of LNCS/LNAI, pages 96–117. Springer-Verlag Inc., New-York, USA, September23-25 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Girard, J.-Y. Linear logic. In Theoretical Computer Science, 50:1–102, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. de Groote, P. and C. Retoré. On the semantic readings of proof-nets. In Geert-Jan Kruijff, G. M. and D. Oehrle, editors, Formal Grammar, pages 57–70. FoLLI, Prague, August 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joshi, A. K. and S. Kulick. Partial proof trees, resource sensitive logics and syntactic constraints. In Retoré, C., editor, LACL’96, volume 1328 of LNCS/LNAI, pages 21–42. Springer-Verlag Inc., New-York, USA, September23-25 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joshi, A. K., L. S. Levy, and M. Takahashi. Tree adjunct grammars. In Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 10(1):136–163, 1975.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamarche, F. Proof nets for intuitionistic linear logic: Essantial nets. Technical report, Imperial College, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lecomte, A. and C. Retoré. Pomset logic as an alternative categorial grammar. In Formal Grammar. Barcelona, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lecomte, A. and C. Retoré. Words as modules: a lexicalised grammar in the framework of linear logic proof nets. In International Conference on Mathematical Linguistics. John Benjamins, Tarragona, Spain, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lecomte, A. and C. Retoré. Logique de ressources et réseaux syntaxiques. In Genthial, D., editor, TALN’97, pages 70–83. Pôle langage naturel, Grenoble, 12-13June 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Retoré, C. Réseaux et séquents ordonnés. Ph.D. thesis, University of Paris VII, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Retoré, C. Perfect matchings and series-parallel graphs: multiplicatives proof nets as r&b-graphs. In Girard, J.-Y., M. Okada, and A. Scedrov, editors, Linear Logic 96 Tokyo Meeting, volume 3 of Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. april 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Retoré, C. Pomset logic: a non-commutative extension of classical linear logic. In TLCA’97, volume 1210 of LNCS, pages 300–318. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schabes, Y., A. Abeille, and A. K. Joshi. Parsing strategies with’ lexicalized’ grammars. In 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COL-ING’88), volume 2, pages 579–583. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pogodalla, S. (2001). Lexicalized Proof-Nets and TAGs. In: Moortgat, M. (eds) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LACL 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2014. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45738-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45738-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42251-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45738-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics