Skip to main content

ω-Regular Languages Are Testable with a Constant Number of Queries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2483))

Abstract

We continue the study of combinatorial property testing. For a property ψ, an ɛ-test for ψ, for 0 < ɛ 1, is a randomized algorithm that given an input x, returns “yes” if x satisfies ψ, and returns “no” with high probability if x is ɛ-far from satisfying ψ, where ɛ-far essentially means that an ɛ-fraction of x needs to be changed in order for it to satisfy ψ. In [AKNS99], Alon et al. show that regular languages are ɛ-testable with a constant (depends on ψ and ɛ and independent of x) number of queries. We extend the result in [AKNS99] to ω-regular languages: given a nondeterministic Büchi automaton A on infinite words and a small ɛ > 0, we describe an algorithm that gets as input an infinite lasso-shape word of the form x · y ω, for finite words x and y, samples only a constant number of letters in x and y, returns “yes” if w ∈ L(A), and returns “no” with probability 2/3 if w is ɛ-far from L(A). We also discuss the applicability of property testing to formal verification, where ω-regular languages are used for the specification of the behavior of nonterminating reactive systems, and computations correspond to lasso-shape words.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N. Alon, E. Fischer, M. Krivelevich, and M. Szegedy. Efficient testing of large graphs. In 40th IEEE FOCS, pp. 645–655, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Alon and M. Krivelevich. Testing k-colorability. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics. to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Alon, M. Krivelevich, I. Newman, and M. Szegedy. Regular languages are testable with a constant number of queries. In 40th IEEE FOCS, pp. 645–655, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Alpern and F.B. Schneider. Defining liveness. IPL, 21:181–185, 1985.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Biere, A. Cimatti, E.M. Clarke, and Y. Zhu. Symbolic model checking without BDDs. In TACAS, LNCS 1579, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.A. Bender and D. Ron. Testing acyclicity of directed graphs in sublinear time. In 27th ICALP, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.R. Büchi. On a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic. In ICLMPS 1960, pp. 1–12, Stanford, 1962. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E.M. Clarke and I.A. Draghicescu. Expressibility results for linear-time and branching-time logics. In J.W. de Bakker, W.P. de Roever, and G. Rozenberg, editors, REX Workshop, LNCS 354, pp. 428–437. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.M. Clarke, O. Grumberg, and D. Peled. Model Checking. MIT Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W-P. de Roever, H. Langmaack, and A. Pnueli, editors. Compositionality: The Significant Difference. COMP, LNCS 1536, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Fix. Application of ɛ-test to random simulation. Private communication, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. O. Goldreich, S. Goldwasser, and D. Ron. Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation. Journal of ACM, 45(4):653–750, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. O. Goldreich and D. Ron. Property testing in bounded degree graphs. In 25th STOC, pp. 406–415, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. Goldreich and D. Ron. A sublinear bipartite tester for bounded degree graphs. Combinatorica, 19(3):335–373, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Holzmann. Design and Validation of Computer Protocols. Prentice-Hall International Editions, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. Kupferman and M.Y. Vardi. Model checking of safety properties. Formal methods in System Design, 19(3):291–314, November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L.H. Landweber. Decision problems forω-automata. Mathematical Systems Theory, 3:376–384, 1969.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. K.L. McMillan. Symbolic Model Checking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. McNaughton. Testing and generating infinite sequences by a finite automaton. Information and Control, 9:521–530, 1966.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Parnas and D. Ron. Testing the diameter of graphs. In RANDOM, pp. 85–96, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Parnas, D. Ron, and R. Rubinfeld. Testing parenthesis languages. In 5th RANDOM, pp. 261–272, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Parnas, D. Ron, and A. Samorodnitsky. Proclaiming dictators and juntas or testing boolean formulae. In 5th RANDOM, pp. 273–284, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M.O. Rabin. Decidability of second order theories and automata on infinite trees. Transaction of the AMS, 141:1–35, 1969.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Rubinfeld and M. Sudan. Robust characterization of polynomials with applications to program testing. SI AM Journal on Computing, 25(2): 252–271, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Safra. On the complexity of ω-automata. In 29th FOCS, pp. 319–327, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H.B. Sipma. Diagram-basedVerification of Discrete, Real-time and Hybrid Systems. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A.P. Sistla. Safety, liveness and fairness in temporal logic. Formal Aspects of Computing, 6:495–511, 1994.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. W. Thomas. Automata on infinite objects. Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 165–191, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Y. Vardi and P. Wolper. Reasoning about infinite computations. Information and Computation, 115(1): 1–37, November 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C.H West. Protocol validation in complex systems. In 8th PODC, pp. 303–312, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chockler, H., Kupferman, O. (2002). ω-Regular Languages Are Testable with a Constant Number of Queries. In: Rolim, J.D.P., Vadhan, S. (eds) Randomization and Approximation Techniques in Computer Science. RANDOM 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2483. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45726-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45726-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44147-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45726-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics