Advertisement

Mixing in Time and Space for Lattice Spin Systems: A Combinatorial View

  • Martin Dyer
  • Alistair Sinclair
  • Eric Vigoda
  • Dror Weitz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2483)

Abstract

The paper considers spin systems on the d-dimensional integer lattice ℤd with nearest-neighbor interactions. A sharp equivalence is proved between exponential decay with distance of spin correlations (a spatial property of the equilibrium state) and “super-fast” mixing time of the Glauber dynamics (a temporal property of a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm). While such an equivalence is already known in various forms, the proofs in this paper are purely combinatorial and avoid the functional analysis machinery employed in previous proofs.

Keywords

Spin System Gibbs Measure Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithm Spin Space Gibbs Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. van den Berg, A uniqueness condition for Gibbs measures, with applications to the 2-dimensional Ising antiferromagnet, Comm. Math. Phys., 152, 161–166 (1993).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Bubley and M.E. Dyer, Path coupling: a technique for proving rapid mixing in markov chains, Proc. 38th IEEE Symp. on Found. of Comp. Sc., 223–231 (1997).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Cesi, Quasi-factorization of the entropy and logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for Gibbs random fields, Prob. Theory and Related Fields, 120, 569–584 (2001).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.L. Dobrushin and S.B. Shlosman, Completely Analytical Gibbs Fields, in: J. Fritz, A. Jaffe, D. Szasz, Statistical Mechanics and Dynamical Systems, 371–403, Birkhauser, Boston (1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.A. Fill and M. Machida, Stochastic monotonicity and realizable monotonicity, Ann. of Prob., 29, 938–978 (2001).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O. Häggström, J. Jonasson and R. Lyons, Explicit isoperimetric constants and phase transitions in the random-cluster model, Ann. of Prob., 30, 443–473 (2002).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Kenyon, E. Mossel and Y. Peres, Glauber dynamics on trees and hyperbolic graphs, Proc. 42nd IEEE Symp. on Found. of Comp. Sc., 568–578 (2001).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Martinelli, Lectures on Glauber dynamics for discrete spin models, Lectures on Probability Theory and Statistics (Saint-Flour, 1997), Lecture notes in Math. 1717, 93–191, Springer, Berlin (1998).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Martinelli and E. Olivieri, Approach to equilibrium of Glauber dynamics in the one phase region I: The attractive case, Comm. Math. Phys. 161, 447–486 (1994).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Martinelli and E. Olivieri, Approach to equilibrium of Glauber dynamics in the one phase region II: The general case, Comm. Math. Phys. 161, 487–514 (1994).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.W. Stroock and B. Zegarlinski, The logarithmic Sobolev inequality for discrete spin systems on a lattice, Comm. Math. Phys. 149, 175–194 (1992).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Dyer
    • 1
  • Alistair Sinclair
    • 2
  • Eric Vigoda
    • 3
  • Dror Weitz
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Computer Science DivisionUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations