Skip to main content

Quantification and Intensionality in Situation Semantics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2276))

Abstract

In this paper we present a type-driven interpretation approach to semantic theory. We will introduce a formalization of the notion of the speaker’s references in a context, and a semantical storage mechanism for resolving the quantificational and de re/de dicto scope ambiguities. In Montague Grammar (PTQ) all verbs are initially treated as intensional, and then the extensional translations, whenever they exist, are derived from the intensional ones by the use of meaning postulates. Such a treatment of the extensional verbs, besides of being counterintuitive, increases dramatically the complexity of the computations of the semantical representations of the sentences, which exponentially propagates to the text processing. The paper introduces a lexicalized situation semantics treatment of the quantifiers and the intensional verbs. The approach is illustrated by a grammar, which uses a semantical storage. Primarily, the semantic storage targets the anaphoric and quantificational relations and related scope ambiguities, but it also facilitates the represention of the de re/de dicto “reading” capacities of the intensional verbs. The grammar accounts for the difference between extensional and intensional verbs by the means of appropriateness conditions for filling the semantical argument roles of the relations denoted by the verbs. The semantical rules for the verb phrases result in type-driven calculations triggered by discourse information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barwise, Jon and John Perry. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA:MIT press. Republished in 1999 by The David Hume Series of Philosophy and Cognitive Science Reissues.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barwise, Jon. 1987. The situation in Logic. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 17. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, Robin. 1992. A Working Person’s Guide to Situation Theory. in Topics in Semantic Interpretation, ed. by Steffen Leo Hansen and Finn Soerensen, Samfundslitteratur, Frederiksberg, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dowty, David, Robert Wall and Stanley Peters. 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Volume 11. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ginzburg Jonathan and Ivan A. Sag. 2001. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Distributed by the University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hobbs, Jerry and Stuart Shieber. An Algorithm for Generating Quantifier Scopings. Computational Linguistics, volume 13, numbers 1–2, pages 47–63, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klein, Ewan and Ivan Sag Type-Driven Translation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8 (1985). p. 163–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Loukanova, R. 2000. Nominal Scope in Situation Semantics. CICLing-2000 Proceedings: Computational linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing by IPN Publishing House. Mexico. [A shorter version is reprinted in the Proceedings of 14th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC14), 2000 Waseda University International Conference Center, Tokyo, Japan. Proceedings, 243-252 p. Ikeya A. and M. Kawamori (eds.) Logico-Linguistic Society of Japan, The Institute of Language Teaching, WasedaUniversity Media Network Center.]

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loukanova, R. 2002. Generalized Quantification in Situation Semantics. in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seligman, Jerry and Lawrence S. Moss. 1997. Situation Theory. in Van Benthem, J. and A. ter Meulen, eds. Handbook of Logic and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Loukanova, R. (2002). Quantification and Intensionality in Situation Semantics. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2276. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45715-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45715-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43219-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45715-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics