Abstract
The functioning of natural language communication depends crucially on the different kinds of signs, i.e., symbol, indexical, and name, and their characteristic mechanisms of reference. In this paper, the meanings of these sign types are traced to cognitive agents with memory but without language.
The argument is based on the task of relating the view-dependent format of a content stemming from an agent’s current situation to a view-independent format for storage in memory. The view-dependent analysis of a content, called a task analysis, is built from cognitive structures suitable to serve as the literal meanings of the different sign types. Furthermore, the transfer between the view-dependent format relating to the current situation and the view-independent format of content stored in memory in [-language] agents is shown to be closely related to the alternation between the hearer and the speaker mode in [+language] agents.
While perception is a necessary condition for life, it is not sufficient. For example, we may grant that robots have perception, yet deny that they are alive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Davidson, D. & G. Harman (eds.) (1972) Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Fodor, J. (2000) In Critical Condition, Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind, Bradford Books.
Grice, P. (1965) “Utterer’s Meaning, Sentence Meaning, and Word Meaning,” Foundations of Language, 4:1–18.
Hausser, R. (1992) “Complexity in Left-Associative Grammar,” Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 106.2:283–308, Elsevier.
Hausser, R. (2001a) “Spatio-Temporal Indexing in Database Semantics,” in A. Gelbukh (ed.) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2004. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, NewYork.
Hausser, R. (2001b) “Database Semantics for Natural Language,” Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 130.1:27–74, Elsevier.
Hausser, R. (1999/2001) Foundations of Computational Linguistics, Human-Computer Communication in Natural Language, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, NewYork, 2nd Ed.
Kripke, S. (1972) “Naming and Necessity,” in Davidson & Harmann (eds.), 253–355.
Mel’čuk, I. A. (1988) Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice, State University of New York Press, NewYork.
Morris, C.W. (1946) Signs, Language, and Behavior, NewYork.
Peirce, C.S. (1940) The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings. J. Buchler (ed.), London.
Reichenbach, H. (1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic, The Free Press, NewYork.
Saussure, F. de (1972) Cours de linguistique générale, Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro, Éditions Payot, Paris.
Searle, J.R. (1969) Speech Acts, CUP, Cambridge, England.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hausser, R. (2002). A Hypothesis on the Origin of the Sign Types. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2276. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45715-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45715-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43219-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45715-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive