Skip to main content

Self-adaptive Operator Scheduling Using the Religion-Based EA

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN VII (PPSN 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2439))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The optimal choice of the variation operators mutation and crossover and their parameters can be decisive for the performance of evolutionary algorithms (EAs). Usually the type of the operators (such as Gaussian mutation) remains the same during the entire run and the probabilistic frequency of their application is determined by a constant parameter, such as a fixed mutation rate. However, recent studies have shown that the optimal usage of a variation operator changes during the EA run. In this study, we combined the idea of self-adaptive mutation operator scheduling with the Religion-Based EA (RBEA), which is an agent model with spatially structured and variable sized subpopulations (religions). In our new model (OSRBEA), we used a selection of different operators, such that each operator type was applied within one specific subpopulation only. Our results indicate that the optimal choice of operators is problem dependent, varies during the run, and can be handled by our self-adaptive OSRBEA approach. Operator scheduling could clearly improve the performance of the already very powerful RBEA and was superior compared to a classic and other advanced EA approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Krink, T. and Ursem, R.K.: Parameter Control Using the Agent Based Patchwork Model. In: Proceedings of the Second Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2000), Vol. 1. San Diego, CA, USA (2000) 77–83

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bäck, T.: Self-Adaptation in Genetic Algorithms. In: F. J. Varela, P.B. (ed.): Proceedings of 1st European Conference on Artificial Life. MIT Press (1992) 263–271

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eiben, A.E., Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, I.G., and Thijssen, B.A.: Competing Crossovers in an Adaptive GA Framework. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (1998) 787–792

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, J.E. and Fogarty, T.C.: Self Adaptation of Mutation Rates in a Steady State Genetic Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computing, IEEE Press (1996) 318–323

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, L.: Adapting Operator Probabilities in Genetic Algorithms. In: Schaffer, J.D. (ed.): Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA III) (1989) 61–69

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schlierkamp-Voosen, D. and Mühlenbein, H.: Strategy Adaptation by Competing Subpopulations. In: Davidor, Y., Schwefel, H.P., and Maenner, R. (eds.): Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN III) (1994) 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomsen, R., Rickers, P., and Krink, T.: A Religion-Based Spatial Model For Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Schoenauer, M., Deb, K., Rudolph, G., Yao, X., Lutton, E., Merelo, J.J., and Schwefel, H.P. (eds.): Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VI) (2000) 817–826

    Google Scholar 

  8. Whitley, D.: Cellular Genetic Algorithms. In: Forrest, S. (ed.): Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Morgan Kaufman (1993) 658

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bäck, T., Fogel, D.B., Michalewicz, Z., et al. (eds.).: Handbook on Evolutionary Computation. IOP Publishing Ltd and Oxford University Press (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krink, T., Rickers, P., and Thomsen, R.: Applying Self-Organised Criticality to Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Schoenauer, M., Deb, K., Rudolph, G., Yao, X., Lutton, E., Merelo, J.J., and Schwefel, H.P. (eds.): Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VI) (2000) 375–384

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thomsen, R. and Rickers, P. Introducing Spatial Agent-Based Models and Self-Organised Criticality to Evolutionary Algorithms. Master’s thesis, University of Aarhus, Denmark (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thomsen, R., Krink, T. (2002). Self-adaptive Operator Scheduling Using the Religion-Based EA. In: Guervós, J.J.M., Adamidis, P., Beyer, HG., Schwefel, HP., Fernández-Villacañas, JL. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN VII. PPSN 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2439. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45712-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45712-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44139-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45712-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics