Skip to main content

The Admon-Time Workflow Client: Why Do We Need the Third Type of Workflow Client Designated for Administration and Monitoring Services?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Web-Age Information Management (WAIM 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2419))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 320 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is to answer for the question on the title. It proposes and implements a novel type of workflow client that is designated for supporting workflow administrative functionality and monitoring services. Almost all the traditional workflow management systems provide two types of operational user interfaces — the build-time client and the run-time client. Especially, the run-time client provides a working environment for users and incorporates process-level services in terms of the administration and monitoring aspect. However, according to the considerations of emerging transactional workflow applications and distributed workflow enactment architectures, we have frequently recognized that it is necessary for the workflow administration and monitoring services to be taken apart from the run-time client, because the statistical information rather than the status information is much more important in the transactional workflows consisting of a set of transactions, and the administrative functionality needs to be much more sophisticated for the distributed workflow engine components. These mean simultaneously that the run-time client ought to be much heavier, which should be opposite for the recent trend pursuing the light client over the internet. Conclusively, what we create a designated workflow client makes much sense not only if it is appropriately featured for the advanced monitoring functions, but also if it is able to be easily extended to accommodate the system-level administrative features. That is, a new type of workflow client, which is functionally designated only for the administration and monitoring services, is required for satisfying those new functional demands. We call it “Admon-time client”. This paper illustrates how to construct the admon-time client and its operational architecture, how the admon-time co-operates with the run-time as well as the build-time, and how to build the operational user interfaces for it. Finally, the transactional workflow administration monitoring system built in this paper is genetically characterized as fully dispersed (distributed) architectures, conceptually supporting the transactional workflow model, physically implemented by the object-oriented methodology with JAVA and CORBA technology, and fully operational on a web-based environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Workflow Management Coalition Specification Document, “The Workflow Reference Model.”, Version 1.1, November 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Workflow Management Coalition Specification Document, “Workflow Coalition Interface 1: Process Definition Interchange Process Model”, Document Number: WFMC TC-1016-P, August 5, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Workflow Management Coalition Specification Document, “Workflow Management Application Programming Interface (Interface 2&3) Specification”, Version 2.0e, Document Number: WFMC TC-1009, July 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Workflow Management Coalition Specification Document, “Workflow Client Application (Interface 2) Application Programming Interface (WAPI) Naming Conventions”, Version 1.4, Document Number: WFMC-TC-1013, November 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Workflow Management Coalition Specification Document, “Workflow Standard — Interoperability Abstract Specification”, Version 1.0, Document Number: WFMC-TC-1012, October 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Workflow Management Coalition Specification Document, “Workflow Standard — Interoperability Internet e-mail MIME binding “, Version 1.1, Document Number: WFMC-TC-1018, September 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Workflow Management Coalition Specification Document, “Workflow Management Coalition Audit Data Specification”, Version 1.1, Document Number: WFMC-TC-1015, September 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Workflow Management Coalition Specification Document, “Workflow management Coalition Terminology & Glossary”, Version 2.0, Document Number: WFMC-TC-1011, June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nortel & University of Newcastle upon Tyne, “Workflow Management Facility Specification”, Revised Submission, OMG Document Number: bom/98-03-01, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joint Submitters, “Workflow Management Facility”, Revised Submission, OMG Document Number: bom/98-06-07, July 4, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Electronic Data System Corporation, “EDS Workflow Management Facility”, Initial Submission OMG Document Number: bom/97-08-06, August 29, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Paul, E. Park and J. Chaar, “RainMan: a Workflow System for the Internet”, Proc. Of USENIX Symp. On Internet Technologies and Systems, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Das S., Kochut K., Miller J., Seth A. and Worah, D., “ORBWork: A reliable distributed CORBA-based workflow enactment system for METEOR2”, Tech. Report No. UGA-CS-TR 97-001, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Georgia, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kwang-Hoon Kim and Clarence A. Ellis, “A Framework for Workflow Architectures”, University of Colorado/Department of Computer Science, Technical Reports, CU-CS-847-97, Dec. 1997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, KH., Kim, IS. (2002). The Admon-Time Workflow Client: Why Do We Need the Third Type of Workflow Client Designated for Administration and Monitoring Services?. In: Meng, X., Su, J., Wang, Y. (eds) Advances in Web-Age Information Management. WAIM 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2419. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45703-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45703-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44045-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45703-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics