Skip to main content

Widening the Boundary between Decidable and Undecidable Hybrid Systems*

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2421))

Abstract

We revisited decidability of the reachability problem for low dimensional hybrid systems. Even though many attempts have been done to draw the boundary between decidable and undecidable hybrid systems there are still many open problems in between. In this paper we show that the reachability question for some two dimensional hybrid systems are undecidable and that for other 2-dim systems this question remains unanswered, showing that it is as hard as the reachability problem for Piecewise Affine Maps, that is a well known open problem.

Partially supported by CNRS Project MathSTIC “Squash— Analyse Qualitative de Systémes Hybrides”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Alur, C. Courcoubetis, N. Halbwachs, T. A. Henzinger, P.-H. Ho, X. Nicollin, A. Olivero, J. Sifakis, and S. Yovine. The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems. TCS, 138:3–34, 1995.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Alur, C. Courcoubetis, T. A. Henzinger, and P.-H. Ho. Hybrid automata: An algorithmic approach to the specification and verification of hybrid systems. LNCS 736, p. 209–229. Springer-Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Alur and D. L. Dill. A theory of timed automata. TCS, 126:183–235, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Alur, T. A. Henzinger, and M. Y. Vardi. Parametric real-time reasoning. In 25th ACM STOC, p. 592–601, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Alur, S. Kannan, and S. La Torre. Polyhedral flows in hybrid automata. In HSCC’99, LNCS 1569, p. 5–18. Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Asarin and O. Maler. On some relations between dynamical systems and transition systems. In ICALP’94, LNCS 820. Springer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Asarin, O. Maler, and A. Pnueli. Reachability analysis of dynamical systems having piecewise-constant derivatives. TCS, 138:35–65, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Asarin, G. Schneider, and S. Yovine. On the decidability of the reachability problem for planar digfierential inclusions. In HSCC’2001, LNCS 2034, p. 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. S. Bobrow and M. A. Arbib. Discrete Mathematics. W. B. Saunders, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Blondel and J. Tsitsilkis. Complexity of stability and controllability of elementary hybrid systems. Automatica, 35:479–489, 1999.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. O. Bournez. Complexité algorithmique des systèmes dynamiques continus et hybrides. PhD thesis, ENS de Lyon, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Bouyer, C. Dufourd, E. Fleury, and A. Petit. Are timed automata updatable? In CAV’2000, LNCS 1855, p. 464–479.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Bouyer, C. Dufourd, E. Fleury, and A. Petit. Expressiveness of updatable timed automata. In MFCS’2000, LNCS 1893, p. 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. S. Branicky. Universal computation and other capabilities of hybrid and continuous dynamical systems. TCS, 138(1), 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Čerāns. Algorithmic problems in analysis of real-time systems specifications. PhD thesis, Univ. of Latvia, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Čerāns and J. Vïksna. Deciding reachability for planar multi-polynomial systems. In Hybrid Systems III, LNCS 1066. Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. L. Devaney. An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 2nd edition, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Linear Algebra. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Henle. A combinatorial introduction to topology. Dover publications, Inc., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. A. Henzinger, P. W. Kopke, A. Puri, and P. Varaiya. What’s decidable about hybrid automata? In STOC’1995, p. 373–382. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. A. Henzinger. The theory of hybrid automata. In LICS’96, p. 278–292, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. W. Hirsch and S. Smale. Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems and Linear Algebra. Academic Press Inc., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Kesten, A. Pnueli, J. Sifakis, and S. Yovine. Integration graphs: a class of decidable hybrid systems. In Hybrid Systems, LNCS 736, p. 179–208, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Koiran. My favourite problems. http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~koiran/problems.html.

  25. P. Koiran, M. Cosnard, and M. Garzon. Computability with low-dimensional dynamical systems. TCS, 132(1):113–128, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Koiran and C. Moore. Closed-form analytic maps in one and two dimensions can simulate universal Turing machines. TCS, 210:217–223, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. O. Maler and A. Pnueli. Reachability analysis of planar multi-linear systems. In CAV’93, LNCS 697, p. 194–209. Springer-Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. L. Minsky. Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines. Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Moore. Unpredictability and undecidability in dynamical systems. Physical Review Letters, 64(20), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  30. X. Nicollin, A. Olivero, J. Sifakis, and S. Yovine. An approach to the description and analysis of hybrid systems. In Hybrid Systems, LNCS 736, p. 149–178, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. H. Papadimitriou. Computational complexity. Addison-Wesley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Puri and P. Varaiya. Decidability of hybrid systems with rectangular differential inclusions. In CAV’94, LNCS 818, p. 95–104. Springer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. Schneider. Algorithmic Analysis of Polygonal Hybrid Systems. PhD thesis, VERIMAG— UJF, Grenoble, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. K. S. Sibirsky. Introduction to Topological Dynamics. Noordhoff International Publishing, Leyden, 1975.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Simić, K. Johansson, S. Sastry, and J. Lygeros. Towards a geometric theory of hybrid systems. In HSCC’00, LNCS 1790. Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Asarin, E., Schneider, G. (2002). Widening the Boundary between Decidable and Undecidable Hybrid Systems* . In: Brim, L., Křetínský, M., Kučera, A., Jančar, P. (eds) CONCUR 2002 — Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2421. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45694-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45694-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44043-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45694-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics