Advertisement

A Knowledge Discovery by Fuzzy Rule Based Hopfield Network

  • Thanakorn Sornkaew
  • Yasuo Yamashita
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2412)

Abstract

In this paper, a new method for discovering knowledge from empirical data is proposed. This model consists of five steps. Firstly, we find the centers of fuzzy membership functions using adapted self-organizing feature map (SOFM). Secondly, we use the centers of Gaussian membership functions derived from previous step to determine the widths of Gaussian membership functions by means of the first-nearest-neighbor heuristic. Thirdly, it builds a weight network of Hopfield network so that weights reflect the importance of the network’s connections. Fourthly, Hopfield network is operated to get output values. The final step is to extract rules or knowledge via our proposed algorithm. In this algorithm, the irrelevant candidate rules are deleted so that the number of fuzzy rules and the number of antecedents can be defined. Therefore, it extracts fuzzy rules from the network. The experiments on wine recognition data show good performance concerning predictive accuracy.

Keywords

Membership Function Fuzzy Rule Knowledge Discovery Synaptic Weight Fuzzy Membership Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    C.T. Lin and C. S. G. Lee, “Neural-network-based Fuzzy Logic Control and Decision System,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 40, pp. 1320–1336, 1991.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    W. A. Farag, V. H. Quintana, and G. Lambert-Torres, “A genetic-based neuro-fuzzy approach for modeling and control of dynamical systems,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 9, pp. 756–767, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Sugeno and T. Yasukawa, “A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 1, pp. 7–31, Feb. 1993.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    I. A. Taha and J. Ghosh, “Symbolic interpretation artificial neural network,” IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., vol. 11, pp. 448–463, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    K. J. Cios, A. Teresinska, S. Konieczna, J. Potocka, and S. Sharma, “A knowledge discovery approach to diagnosing myocardial perfusion,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, vol. 19, pp. 17–25, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. L. Wong, W. Lam, K. S. Leung, P. Sh. Ngan, and J. C.Y. Cheng, “Discovery knowledge from medical databases using evolutionary algorithms,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, vol. 19, pp. 45–55, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    U. M. Fayyad, “Data mining and knowledge discovery: making sense out of data,” IEEE Expert, vol. 11, pp. 20–25, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    E. Mamdani, “Advances in the linguistic synthesis of fuzzy controllers,” Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 8, pp. 669–678, 1976.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thanakorn Sornkaew
    • 1
  • Yasuo Yamashita
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementNihon UniversityChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations