Abstract
Consider a formula which contains n variables and m clauses with the form Φ = Φ 2 Λ Φ 3 , where Φ 2 is an instance of 2-SAT which contains m 2 2-clauses and Φ 3 is an instance of 3-SAT which contains m3 3-clauses. Фis an instance of (2 + f(n))-SAT if m 3/m 2+m 3≤ f(n). We prove that (2 + f(n))-SAT is in \( \mathcal{P} \) if f(n) = O (log n /n 2), and in \( \mathcal{N}\mathcal{P}\mathcal{C} \) if f(n) = 1/n 2-ɛ(∨ɛ: 0 < ε < 2). Most interestingly, we give a candidate ( 2 + (log n)k/n 2)-SAT (k ≥ 2), for natural problems in \( \mathcal{N}\mathcal{P}--\mathcal{N}\mathcal{P}\mathcal{C}--\mathcal{P} \) (denoted as \( \mathcal{N}\mathcal{P}\mathcal{I} \) ) with respect to this (2 + f(n))-SAT model. We prove that the restricted version of it is not in \( \mathcal{N}\mathcal{P}\mathcal{C} \) under the assumption \( \mathcal{P} \) ≠\( \mathcal{N}\mathcal{P} \) . Actually it is indeed in \( \mathcal{N}\mathcal{P}\mathcal{I} \) under some stronger but plausible assumption, specifically, the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH) which was introduced by Impagliazzo and Paturi.
This research is supported by a research grant of City University of Hong Kong 7001023.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. E. Lander. On the Structure of Polynomial Time Reducibility. Jour. of ACM, 22, 1975, pp. 155–171.
H. Papadimitriou. Computational Complexity, 329–332, Addison-Wesley (1994)
O. Goldreich. Introduction to Complexity, 23–25 (1999). Also available from http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~oded/
Uwe Schoning. A Probabilistic Algorithm for k-SAT and Constraint Satisfaction Problems. In FOCS 1999: 410–420.
Russell Impagliazzo and Ramamohan Paturi. Which Problems Have Strongly Exponential Complexity? In FOCS 1998: 653–664.
Russell Impagliazzo and Ramamohan Paturi. Complexity of k-SAT. JCSS 62(2): 367–375, 2001.
S. Micali, M. Rabin and S. Vadhan. Verifiable random functions. In FOCS 1999: 120–130.
C. Dwork and M. Naor. Zaps and their applications. In FOCS 2000: 283–293. Also available from http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~naor/
R. Canetti, O. Goldreich, S. Goldwasser and S. Micali. Resettable zero-knowledge. In STOC 2000: 235–244.
S. Micali and L. Reyzin. Soundness in the public-key model. In Crypt 2001:542–565. Also available from http://www.cs.bu.edu/~reyzin/
R. Monasson, R. Zecchina, S. Kirkpatrick, B. Selman and L. Troyansky. Determining computational complexity from characteristic ‘phase transitions’, Nature 400, 133–137 (1999).
W. Anderson. Solving problems in finite time, Nature 400, 115–116 (1999).
S. Kirkpatrick and B. Selman. Critical behavior in the satisfiability of random Boolean expressions, Science, (264): 1297–1301 (1994).
R. Monasson and R. Zecchina. Tricritical points in random combinatorics: the 2+p SAT case, J. Phys. A (31): 9209–9217 (1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Deng, X., Lee, C.H., Zhao, Y., Zhu, H. (2002). (2 + f(n))-SAT and Its Properties. In: Ibarra, O.H., Zhang, L. (eds) Computing and Combinatorics. COCOON 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2387. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45655-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45655-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43996-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45655-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive