Abstract
What criteria for relevance do users apply when selecting a speech recording? What attributes of the recording do they rely on for each criterion? This paper proposes a qualitative research study design to explore those questions. A conceptual framework is presented, research questions are introduced, and the study design is described. The paper concludes with some observations on how the results of the study might inform the design of future systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C.L. Barry. User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3):149–159, 1994.
J.W. Creswell. Research Deisgn: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks: CA, 1994.
J.A. Maxwell. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks: CA, 1996.
Douglas W. Oard. User interface design for speech-based retrieval. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 25(5):20–22, 2000.
T.K. Park. The nature of relevance in information retrieval: An empirical study. Library Quarterly, 63(3):318–351, 1993.
T. Saracevic. Relevance: A review of a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Advances in Librarianship, 6:79–138, 1976.
L. Schamber. Revance and information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 29:1–48, 1994.
L. Schamber, M.B. Eisenberg, and M.S. Nilan. A re-examination of relevance: Toward a dynamic, situational definition. Information Processing and Management, 26(6):755–766, 1990.
L. Slaughter, D.W. Oard, V.L. Warnick, J.L. Harding, and G.J. Wilkerson. A graphical interface for speech-based retrieval. In The Third ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, 1998.
T. Tombros and F. Crestani. Users’ perception of relevance of spoken documents. JASIS, 51(10):929–939, 2000.
P. Wang and D. Soergel. A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2):115–133, 1998.
S. Whittaker, J. Hirschberg, and C.H. Nakatani. Play it again: A study of the factors underlying speech browsing behavior. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 98, pages 18–23, April 1998.
P. Wilson. Situational relevance. Information Storage and Retrieval, 9:457–471, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kim, J., Oard, D.W. (2002). The Use of Speech Retrieval Systems: A Study Design. In: Coden, A.R., Brown, E.W., Srinivasan, S. (eds) Information Retrieval Techniques for Speech Applications. IRTSA 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2273. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45637-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45637-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43156-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45637-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive