Skip to main content

A Decidable CLDS for Some Propositional Resource Logics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2408))

  • 766 Accesses

Abstract

The compilation approach for Labelled Deductive Systems (CLDS) is a general logical framework. Previously, it has been applied to various resource logics within natural deduction, tableaux and clausal systems, and in the latter case to yield a decidable (first order) CLDS for propositional Intuitionistic Logic (IL). In this paper the same clausal approach is used to obtain a decidable theorem prover for the implication fragments of propositional substructural Linear Logic (LL) and Relevance Logic (RL). The CLDS refutation method is based around a semantic approach using a translation technique utilising first-order logic together with a simple theorem prover for the translated theory using techniques drawn from Model Generation procedures. The resulting system is shown to correspond to a standard LL(RL) presentation as given by appropriate Hilbert axiom systems and to be decidable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. D’Agostino and D. Gabbay. A generalisation of analytic deduction via labelled deductive systems. Part I: Basic substructural Logics. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 13:243–281, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Broda, M. Finger and A. Russo. Labelled Natural Deduction for Substructural Logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL, Vol. 7, No. 3, May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Broda and D. Gabbay. An Abductive CLDS. In Labelled Deduction, Kluwer, Ed. D. Basin et al, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Broda and D. Gabbay. A CLDS for Propositional Intuitionistic Logic. TABLEAUX-99, USA, LNAI 1617, Ed. N. Murray, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Broda and A. Russo. A Unified Compilation Style Labelled Deductive System for Modal and Substructural Logic using Natural Deduction. Technical Report 10/97. Department of Computing, Imperial College 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Broda, A. Russo and D. Gabbay. A Unified Compilation Style Natural Deduction System for Modal, Substructural and Fuzzy logics, in Dicovering World with Fuzzy logic: Perspectives and Approaches to Formalization of Human-consistent Logical Systems. Eds V. Novak and I. Perfileva, Springer-Verlag 2000

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Bundy. The Computer Modelling of Mathematical Reasoning. Academic Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. L. Chang and R. Lee. Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Academic Press 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Gabbay. Labelled Deductive Systems, Volume I-Foundations. OUP, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. H. Gallier. Logic for Computer Science. Harper and Row, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hasegawa, H. Fujita and M. Koshimura. MGTP: A Model Generation Theorem Prover-Its Advanced Features and Applications. In TABLEAUX-97, France, LNAI 1229, Ed. D. Galmiche, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Mc.Cune. Otter 3.0 Reference Manual and Guide. Argonne National Laboraqtory, Argonne, Illinois, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.A. Robinson. Logic, Form and Function. Edinburgh Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Russo. Modal Logics as Labelled Deductive Systems. PhD. Thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. A. Schmidt. Resolution is a decision procedure for many propositional modal logics. Advances in Modal Logic, Vol. 1, CSLI, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. B. Thistlethwaite, M. A. McRobbie and R. K. Meyer. Automated Theorem-Proving in Non-Classical Logics, Wiley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Broda, K. (2002). A Decidable CLDS for Some Propositional Resource Logics. In: Kakas, A.C., Sadri, F. (eds) Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2408. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43960-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45632-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics