Abstract
The compilation approach for Labelled Deductive Systems (CLDS) is a general logical framework. Previously, it has been applied to various resource logics within natural deduction, tableaux and clausal systems, and in the latter case to yield a decidable (first order) CLDS for propositional Intuitionistic Logic (IL). In this paper the same clausal approach is used to obtain a decidable theorem prover for the implication fragments of propositional substructural Linear Logic (LL) and Relevance Logic (RL). The CLDS refutation method is based around a semantic approach using a translation technique utilising first-order logic together with a simple theorem prover for the translated theory using techniques drawn from Model Generation procedures. The resulting system is shown to correspond to a standard LL(RL) presentation as given by appropriate Hilbert axiom systems and to be decidable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. D’Agostino and D. Gabbay. A generalisation of analytic deduction via labelled deductive systems. Part I: Basic substructural Logics. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 13:243–281, 1994.
K. Broda, M. Finger and A. Russo. Labelled Natural Deduction for Substructural Logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL, Vol. 7, No. 3, May 1999.
K. Broda and D. Gabbay. An Abductive CLDS. In Labelled Deduction, Kluwer, Ed. D. Basin et al, 1999.
K. Broda and D. Gabbay. A CLDS for Propositional Intuitionistic Logic. TABLEAUX-99, USA, LNAI 1617, Ed. N. Murray, 1999.
K. Broda and A. Russo. A Unified Compilation Style Labelled Deductive System for Modal and Substructural Logic using Natural Deduction. Technical Report 10/97. Department of Computing, Imperial College 1997.
K. Broda, A. Russo and D. Gabbay. A Unified Compilation Style Natural Deduction System for Modal, Substructural and Fuzzy logics, in Dicovering World with Fuzzy logic: Perspectives and Approaches to Formalization of Human-consistent Logical Systems. Eds V. Novak and I. Perfileva, Springer-Verlag 2000
A. Bundy. The Computer Modelling of Mathematical Reasoning. Academic Press, 1983.
C. L. Chang and R. Lee. Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Academic Press 1973.
D. Gabbay. Labelled Deductive Systems, Volume I-Foundations. OUP, 1996.
J. H. Gallier. Logic for Computer Science. Harper and Row, 1986.
R. Hasegawa, H. Fujita and M. Koshimura. MGTP: A Model Generation Theorem Prover-Its Advanced Features and Applications. In TABLEAUX-97, France, LNAI 1229, Ed. D. Galmiche, 1997.
W. Mc.Cune. Otter 3.0 Reference Manual and Guide. Argonne National Laboraqtory, Argonne, Illinois, 1994.
J.A. Robinson. Logic, Form and Function. Edinburgh Press, 1979.
A. Russo. Modal Logics as Labelled Deductive Systems. PhD. Thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College, 1996.
R. A. Schmidt. Resolution is a decision procedure for many propositional modal logics. Advances in Modal Logic, Vol. 1, CSLI, 1998.
P. B. Thistlethwaite, M. A. McRobbie and R. K. Meyer. Automated Theorem-Proving in Non-Classical Logics, Wiley, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broda, K. (2002). A Decidable CLDS for Some Propositional Resource Logics. In: Kakas, A.C., Sadri, F. (eds) Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2408. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43960-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45632-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive