Skip to main content

Question Answering: From Partitions to Prolog

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2381))

Abstract

We implement Groenendijk and Stokhof’s partition semantics of questions in a simple question answering algorithm. The algorithm is sound, complete, and based on tableau theorem proving. The algorithm relies on a syntactic characterization of answerhood: Any answer to a question is equivalent to some formula built up only from instances of the question. We prove this characterization by translating the logic of interrogation to classical predicate logic and applying Craig’s interpolation theorem.

We would like to thank Patrick Blackburn, Paul Dekker, Jeroen Groenendijk, Maarten Marx, Stuart Shieber, and the anonymous referees for their useful comments and discussions. The 13th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, the 13th Amsterdam Colloquium, and Stanford University’s Center for the Study of Language and Information provided stimulating environments that led to this collaboration. The second author is supported by the United States National Science Foundation under Grant IRI-9712068.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beckert, Bernhard. 1994. Adding equality to semantic tableaux. In Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on theorem proving with analytic tableaux and related methods, ed. Krysia Broda, Marcello D’Agostino, Rajeev Goré, Rob Johnson, and Steve Reeves, 29–41. Tech. Rep. TR-94/5, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beckert, Bernhard, and Joachim Posegga. 1995. leanTAP: Lean, tableau-based deduction. Journal of Automated Reasoning 15(3):339–358.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bos, Johan, and Malte Gabsdil. 2000. First-order inference and the interpretation of questions and answers. In Proceedings of Götalog 2000, ed. Massimo Poesio and David Traum, 43–50. Gothenburg Papers in Computational Linguistics 00-5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chadha, Ritu. 1991. Applications of unskolemization. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fitting, Melvin C. 1996. First order logic and automated theorem proving. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Green, Claude Cordell. 1969. The application of theorem proving to question-answering systems. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University. Reprinted by New York: Garland, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Groenendijk, Jeroen. 1999. The logic of interrogation: Classical version. In SALT IX: Semantics and linguistic theory, ed. Tanya Matthews and Devon Strolovitch, 109–126. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  9. -. 1996. Questions. In Handbook of logic and language, ed. Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, 1055–1124. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hähnle, Reiner. 2001. Tableaux and related methods. In The handbook of automated reasoning, ed. Alan Robinson and Andrei Voronkov, vol. 1, chap. 3, 100–178. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kager, Wouter. 2001. Questions and answers in query logic. Master’s thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luckham, David, and Nils J. Nilsson. 1971. Extracting information from resolution proof trees. Artificial Intelligence 2:27–54.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelken, Rani, and Nissim Francez. 2000. A calculus of interrogatives based on their algebraic semantics. In Proceedings of TWLT16/AMILP2000, ed. Dirk Heylen, Anton Nijholt, and Giuseppe Scollo, 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shan, Chung-chieh, and Balder ten Cate. 2002. The partition semantics of questions, syntactically. In Proceedings of the ESSLLI-2002 student session, ed. Malvina Nissim.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

ten Cate, B., Shan, Cc. (2002). Question Answering: From Partitions to Prolog. In: Egly, U., Fermüller, C.G. (eds) Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. TABLEAUX 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2381. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45616-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45616-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43929-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45616-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics