Skip to main content

Empirical Evaluation of Local Search Methods for Adapting Planning Policies in a Stochastic Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Local Search for Planning and Scheduling (LSPS 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2148))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 646 Accesses

Abstract

Optimization of expected values in a stochastic domain is common in real world applications. However, it is often difficult to solve such optimization problems without significant knowledge about the surface defined by the stochastic function. In this paper we examine the use of local search techniques to solve stochastic optimization. In particular, we analyze assumptions of smoothness upon which these approaches often rely. We examine these assumptions in the context of optimizing search heuristics for a planner/scheduler on two problem domains. We compare three search algorithms to improve the heuristic sets and show that the two chosen local search algorithms perform well. We present empirical data that suggests this is due to smoothness properties of the search space for the search algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bishop, 1995. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Box, G.E.P., Draper, N. R. 1987. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chien, S., Gratch, J., Burl, M. 1995. “On the Efficient Allocation of Resources for Hypothesis Evaluation: A Statistical Approach.” In Proceedings of the IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 17(7), p. 652–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chien, S., Stechert, A., Mutz, D. 1999. “Efficient Heuristic Hypothesis Ranking.” Journal ofArtificial Intelligence Research Vol 10: 375–397.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chien, S., Rabideau, G., Knight, R., Sherwood, R., Engelhardt, B. Mutz, D., Estlin, T., Smith, B. Fisher, F., Barrett, T., Stebbins, G., Tran, D. 2000. “ASPEN-Automating Space Mission Operations using Automated Planning and Scheduling.” SpaceOps 2000, Toulouse, France.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fink, E. 1998. “How to Solve it Automatically: Selection among Problem-Solving Methods.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conf.AI Planning Systems, 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg, D. 1989. Genetic Algorithms: In Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gratch, J.M. and Chien, S. “Adaptive Problem-solving for Large Scale Scheduling Problems: A Case Study,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Vol. 4 (1996), pp. 365–396.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heckerman, David. 1996. A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks. MSR-TR-95-06, Microsoft Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horvitz, E. 1988. “Reasoning under Varying and Uncertain Resource Constraints.” In Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, S., and Kernighan, B. 1973. “An Effective Heuristic for the Traveling Salesman Problem,” Operations Research Vol. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Minton, S. 1996. “Automatically Configuring Constraint Satisfaction Programs: A Case Study.” In Constraints 1:1(7-43).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moore, A., Schneider, T., Boyan, J., Lee, M. S. 1998. “Q2: Memory-based Active Learning for Optimizing Noisy Continuous Functions. ” Proc. ICML 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, S., Norvig, P. 1995. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Russell, S., Subramanian, D., Parr, R. 1993. “Provably Bounded Optimal Agents.” In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, W., Deitterich, T.G., (1996). “High-Performance Job-Shop Scheduling With a Time-Delay TD(λ) Network Proc. NIPS 8, 1024–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zweben, M., Daun, Davis, E., and Deale, M. 1994. “Scheduling & Rescheduling with Iterative Repair.” In Intelligent Scheduling. Morgan Kaufmann. 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Engelhardt, B., Chien, S. (2001). Empirical Evaluation of Local Search Methods for Adapting Planning Policies in a Stochastic Environment. In: Nareyek, A. (eds) Local Search for Planning and Scheduling. LSPS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2148. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45612-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45612-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42898-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45612-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics