Advertisement

A Multi-criteria Taxonomy of Business Models in Electronic Commerce

  • Andreas Bartelt
  • Winfried Lamersdorf
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2232)

Abstract

Looking at the ongoing evolution in electronic commerce there are more and more business models becoming significant. E-shops, e-auctions or etendering are not the only possibilities for a company to be active in electronic commerce. This article presents many relevant business models and systematically classifies them. Mainly the classification is based on the type of business subjects like suppliers, customers and mediators and their active or passive role as initiators and carrier of a business model. Another basis for the classification is the breakdown of the concept of electronic commerce and an explicit modeling. This allows to build up a taxonomy using multiple criteria and the presentation and subsumption of individual business models. The taxonomy can be used to analyze and enhance existing systems and business models as well as to develop new internet strategies for companies. An example of the implementation of the business model e-portal concludes the article.

Keywords

Business Model Electronic Commerce Electronic Information Electronic Market Revenue Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alt, R., Zimmermann, H.-D.: Introduction to Special Section-Business Models, in: EM-Anniversary Edition: Business Models, Electronic Markets, Vol. 11, No. 1, 04/2001, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartelt, A., Lamersdorf, W.: Geschäftsmodelle des Electronic Commerce: Modellbildung und Klassifikation, in: Verbundtagung Wirtschafsinformatik 2000, Shaker, pp. 17–29, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartelt, A., Meyer J.: A practical guideline to the implementation of online-shops, in: SRDS’99, WELCOM’99, 18:348–353, IEEE, Oct. 1999, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartelt, A., Zirpins, C., Fahrenholtz, D.: Geschäftsmodelle der Electronic Information: Modellbildung und Klassifikation, in: Proceedings of the 31. Jahrestagung der deutschen Gesellschaft für Informatik und der Österreichischen Computer Gesellschaft, accepted for publication, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doorenbos, R. B., Etzioni, O., Weld, D. S.: A scalable comparision-shopping agent for the world-wide web, in: Proceedings of Agents’97, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Essler, U.; Whitaker, R.: Re-Thinking eCommerce Business Modeling in terms of Interactivity, in: Electronic Markets, Vol. 11, No. 1, 04/2001, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., van Vliet, H.: Value Based Requirements Creation for Electronic Commerce Applications, in: HICSS 2000, Maui, Hawaii, IEEE, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Guttman, Robert H.; Moukas, Alexandros G.; Maes, Pattie: Agents as Mediators in Electronic Commerce, in: Electronic Markets, 05/98, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Merz, M.: Electronic Commerce: Marktmodelle, Anwendungen und Technologien. Dpunkt.verlag, Heidelberg, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    O'Daniel, T.: A Value-Added Model for Electronic Commerce, in: Electronic Markets, Vol. 11, No. 1, 04/2001, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Reck, M.: Trading-process characteristics of electronic auctions. Electronic Markets, 7(4):17–23, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 13.
    Skiera, B., Lambrecht, A.: Erlösmodelle im Internet, in: Herrmann, A., Albers, S. (Hrsg.), 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Timmers, P.: Business models for electronic markets, in: Electronic Markets, 8(2):3–8, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    Timmers, P.: Electronic commerce: strategies and models for business-to-business trading, Wiley, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Weiss, G. (Editor): Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artifical intelligence, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    Zirpins, C., Weinreich, H., Bartelt, A., Lamersdorf, W.: Advanced Concepts for Next Generation Portals, DEXA 2001, Workshop WBC, accepted for publication, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Bartelt
    • 1
  • Winfried Lamersdorf
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Hamburg, VSYSHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations