Advertisement

Performance of On-Chip Multiprocessors for Vision Tasks (Summary)

  • Y. Chung
  • K. Park
  • W. Hahn
  • N. Park
  • V. K. Prasanna
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1800)

Abstract

Computer vision is a challenging data intensive application. Currently, superscalar architectures dominate the processor marketplace. As more transistors become available on a single chip, the “on-chip multiprocessor” has been proposed as a promising alternative to processors based on the superscalar architecture. This paper examines the performance of vision benchmark tasks on an on-chip multiprocessor. To evaluate the performance, a program-driven simulator and its programming environment were developed. DARPA IU benchmarks were used for evaluation purposes. The benchmark includes integer, floating point, and extensive data movement operations. The simulation results show that the proposed on-chip multiprocessor can exploit thread-level parallelism effectively.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Prasanna Kumar, V.: Parallel Architectures and Algorithms for Image Understanding. Academic Press (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, C, Bhat, P., and Prasanna, V.: High Performance Computing for Vision. IEEE Proceedings, Vol. 84, No. 7 (1996) 931–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Annaratone, M., et al.: The Warp Computer: Architecture, Implementation, and Performance. IEEE Tr. Computers, Vol. 36, No. 12 (1987) 1523–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weems, C., Riseman, E., and Hanson, A.: Image Understanding Architecture: Exploiting Potential Parallelism in Machine Vision. IEEE Computer, Vol. 25, No. 2 (1992) 65–68Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilson, J.: Challenges and Trends in Processor Design. IEEE Computer, Vol. 30, No. 1 (1997) 39–50Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wall, D.: Limits of Instruction Level Parallelism. WRL Research Report, Digital Western Research Laboratory (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hammond, L., et al.: A Single-Chip Multiprocessor. IEEE Computer, Vol. 30, No. 9 (1997) 79–85Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh, J., Weber, W., and Gupta, A.: SPLASH: Stanford Parallel Applications for Shared Memory. Computer Architecture News, Vol. 20, No. 1 (1992) 5–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weems, C, et al.: The DARPA Image Understanding Benchmark for Parallel Computers. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, Vol. 11, No. 1 (1991) 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park, K., et al.: On-Chip Multiprocessing with Simultaneous Multithreading. Technical Report, ETRI (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    POSIX P1003.4a: Threads Extension for Portable Operating Systems, IEEE (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burger, D. and Austin, T.: The SimpleScalar Tool Set, Version 2.0. Technical Report, University of Wisconsin (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bondalapati, K., Dutta, D., Narayanan, S., Prasanna, V. K., Ragahavendra, C, and Seshadri, A.: Optimizing DRAM-based Memory System Performance. Submitted to the 27th Annual International Symposium on Computer ArchitectureGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Musmanno, J. F.: DARPA DIS Benchmarks. Atlantic Aerospace Electronics Corp. (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Chung
    • 1
  • K. Park
    • 1
  • W. Hahn
    • 1
  • N. Park
    • 2
  • V. K. Prasanna
    • 2
  1. 1.Hardware Architecture TeamElectronics and Telecommunications Research InstituteDaeduk Science Town, DaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Department of EE-Systems, EEB-200CUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations