Skip to main content

Risk Reduction in COTS Software Selection with BASIS

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
COTS-Based Software Systems (ICCBSS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2255))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Organizations are moving toward COTS-based software development with limited success. The quality of resulting systems is not measuring up to expectations. Transitioning to a new development paradigm requires many kinds of changes, but the most important concerns the development process. A well-defined approach tailored for COTS-integration is needed. The Base Application Software Integration System (BASIS) is an approach that improves the architecture of COTS-based systems by determining the best integration sequence for the chosen COTS products. The best sequence is determined by synthesizing objective product evaluations, emerging practices in integration technologies, and business priorities. By balancing practices, technologies, and priorities with BASIS techniques, organizations can manage integration risk and make the transition to COTS-based development more successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brereton, Pearl, Budgen, David: Component-Based Systems: A Classification of Issues. IEEE Computer 33, (2000), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cox, Brad: Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Longsta., Thomas A., Chittister, Clyde, Pethia, Rich, Haimes, Yacov Y.: Are We Forgetting the Risks of Information Technology?. IEEE Computer 33, (2000), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gacek, Cristina: Detecting Architectural Mismatches During Systems Composition. DoctoralThesis, University of Southern California, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deline, Robert: Resolving Packaging Mismatch. Doctoral Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, Wei: Another metric suite for object-oriented programming. The Journal of Systems and Software 44, (1998), 155–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen, Wildred J.: A Generic Process and Terminology for Evaluating COTS Software. Proceedings of TOOLS 30, Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, Santa Barbara, California, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, (1999), pp. 547–551.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Polen, Susan M., Louis C. Rose, Barbara C. Phillips: Component Evaluation Process. Software Productivity Consortium, SPC-98091-CMC, Herndon, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ballurio, K., Scalzo, B., Rose, L. (2002). Risk Reduction in COTS Software Selection with BASIS. In: Dean, J., Gravel, A. (eds) COTS-Based Software Systems. ICCBSS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2255. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45588-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45588-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43100-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45588-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics