Advertisement

Shot Noise Suppression in Metallic Quantum Point Contacts

  • H. E. van den Brom
  • J. M. van Ruitenbeek
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 547)

Abstract

Transport properties on atom-size metallic contacts are studied by combining measurements on conductance and shot noise. Results are presented on fewatom contacts of the monovalent metal gold and the trivalent metal aluminum, as well as on larger gold contacts. The experiments are explained in terms of quantum conductance modes. For a single atom gold contact, shot noise tends to be fully suppressed, indicating that only one mode with transmission of nearly unity contributes to the current. In contrast, the trivalent metal aluminum does not show this property. In larger gold contacts the number of partially transmitted modes continuously grows with the contact size.

Keywords

Shot Noise Single Conductance Channel Conductance Mode Contact Size Gold Contact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akimenko A.I., Verkin A.B., and Yanson I.K. (1982): J. Low Temp. Phys. 54, 247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beenakker C.W.J., and Büttiker M. (1992): Phys. Rev. B 46, 1889Google Scholar
  3. Brandbyge M., Schiøtz J., Sørensen M.R., Stoltze P., Jacobsen K.W., Nørskov J.K., Olesen L., Lægsgaard E., Stensgaard I., and Besenbacher F. (1995): Phys. Rev. B 52, 8499Google Scholar
  4. Brandbyge M., Sørensen M.R., and Jacobsen K.W. (1997): Phys. Rev. B 56, 14956Google Scholar
  5. Bürki J., and Stafford C.A. (1999): Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, in printGoogle Scholar
  6. Büttiker M. (1990): Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuevas J.C., Levy Yeyati A., and Martín-Rodero A. (1998): Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Picciotto R., Reznikov M., Heiblum M., Umansky V., Bunin G., and Mahalu D. (1997): Nature 389, 162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gai Z., He Y., Yu H., and Yang W.S. (1996): Phys. Rev. B 53, 1042Google Scholar
  10. Horowitz P., and Hill W. (1989), The art of Electronics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 432Google Scholar
  11. Krans J.M., Muller C.J., Yanson I.K., Govaert Th.C.M., Hesper R., and van Ruitenbeek J.M. (1993): Phys. Rev. B 48, 14721Google Scholar
  12. Krans J.M., van Ruitenbeek J.M., Fisun V.V., Yanson I.K., and de Jongh L.J. (1995): Nature 375, 767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kulik I.O., and Omel'yanchuk A.N. (1984): Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 10, 158Google Scholar
  14. Kumar A., Saminadayar L., Glattli D.C., Jin Y., and Etienne B. (1996): Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lesovik G.B. (1989): Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 49, 592Google Scholar
  16. Ludoph B., Esteve D., Urbina C., Devoret M.H., and van Ruitenbeek J.M. (1999): Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ludoph B., and van Ruitenbeek J.M. (1999): Phys. Rev. B 59, 12290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muller C.J., van Ruitenbeek J.M., and de Jongh L.J. (1992): Physica C 191, 485; Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reznikov M., Heiblum M., Shtrikman H, and Mahalu D. (1995): Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saminadayar L., Glattli D.C., Jin Y., and Etienne B. (1997): Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scheer E., Joyez P., Esteve D., Urbina C., and Devoret M.H. (1997): Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scheer E., Agraït N., Cuevas J.C., Levy Yeyati A., Ludoph B., Martín-Rodero A., Rubio G., van Ruitenbeek J.M., and Urbina C. (1998): Nature 394, 154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schottky W. (1918): Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 57, 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Steinbach A.H., Martinis J.M., and Devoret M.H. (1996): Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. van den Brom H.E., and van Ruitenbeek J.M. (1999a): Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. van den Brom H.E., and van Ruitenbeek J.M. (1999b), in Quantum physics at the mesoscopic scale, D.C. Glattli and M. Sanquer, eds. (Editions Fronti`eres, Gif-sur-Yvette), in printGoogle Scholar
  27. van der Ziel A. (1986), Noise in Solid State Devices and Circuits (Wiley, New York)Google Scholar
  28. van Wees B.J., van Houten H., Beenakker C.W.J., Williamson J.G., Kouwenhoven L.P., van der Marel D., and Foxon C.T. (1988): Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wharam D.A., Thornton T.J., Newsbury R., Pepper M., Ahmed H., Frost J.E.F., Hasko D.G., Peacock D.C., Ritchie D.A., and Jones G.A.C. (1988): J. Phys. C 21, L209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yanson A.I., and van Ruitenbeek J.M. (1997): Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. E. van den Brom
    • 1
  • J. M. van Ruitenbeek
    • 1
  1. 1.Kamerlingh Onnes LaboratoriumUniversitéit LeidenRA LeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations