Abstract
It is the very purpose of the DEMOS1 project — the subject of this paper2 — to exploit novel forms of computer mediated communication in order to support democracy on-line (‘e-democracy’) and to enhance citizen participation in modern societies.
DEMOS (Delphi Mediation Online System) is funded as a shared-cost RTD project under the 5th Framework Programme of the European Commission (IST) and is being developed by a research consortium comprising eight organisations from five different European countries, representing the fields of academic research, multimedia, software, market research and public administration. The DEMOS Project (IST-1999-20530) commenced September 2000 and is going on for 30 months. For more information see the project web site: http://www.demos-project.org
This report describes the entire spread of the ongoing project and has to be seen as an short introduction to the particular fields of research and development which are pulled together in DEMOS.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benhabib, S., 1996. Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. In: S. Benhabib, ed. Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political; Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 67–94.
Berners-Lee, T., 1997. Realising the Full Potential of the Web. Published at http://www.w3.org/1998/02/Potential.html, visited 2001-07-24
Florian, M. et al., 1999. The Future of Security and Risks in Telecommunication — Expectations of Experts (TeleDelphi). In: G. Mueller and K. Rannenberg, eds. Multilateral Security in Communications. Vol. 3. Muenchen; Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley-Longman, 465–480.
Gasser, L. and M. N. Huhns, eds. 1989. Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Volume II, London: Pitman, San Mateo, Ca.: Morgan.
Gordon, T. et al., 2001. Zeno: Groupware for Discourses on the Internet. To appear in KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, Vol. 15, 2001.
Habermas, J., 1996. Three Normative Models of Democracy. In: S. Benhabib, ed. Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political; Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 21–30.
Luhmann, N., 2000. The Reality of the Mass Media, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Malsch, T. ed. 1998. Sozionik: soziologische Ansichten über künstliche Sozialität. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
Maerker, O. and B. Schmidt-Belz, 2000. Online Mediation for Urban and Regional Planning. In: A. B. Cremers and K. Greve, eds. Computer Science for Environmental Protection, Marburg (Germany): Metropolis, 158–172.
Miller, M., 1992. Discourse and Morality — two case studies of social conflicts in a segmentary and a functionally differentiated society. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 3–38.
Mueller, H. J. et al. 1998. SOCIONICS: Introduction and Potential. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol.1, no.3, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/3/5.html, visited 2001-07-24
Sassi, S., 1997. The Internet and the Art of Conducting Politics: Considerations of Theory and Action. Communication 22, 4, 451–469.
Susskind, L. and J. Cruikshank, 1989.Breaking the Impasse. Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. New York: The Perseus Books Group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luehrs, R., Malsch, T., Voss, K. (2001). Internet, Discourses, and Democracy. In: Terano, T., Ohsawa, Y., Nishida, T., Namatame, A., Tsumoto, S., Washio, T. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2253. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45548-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45548-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43070-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45548-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive