Skip to main content

Why Use a Unified Knowledge Representation?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering of Intelligent Systems (IEA/AIE 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2070))

Abstract

In a unified knowledge representation, data, information and knowledge are all represented in a single formalism. A unified knowledge representation based on “items” is described. Items contain two classes of constraints that apply equally to knowledge and to data. Items are compared to an if-then, or rule-based, knowledge representation. Simple chunks of knowledge that can only be represented by a number of rules are represented as single items. Rule-based formalisms are prone to the introduction of potential maintenance hazards caused by one rule being hidden within another. A single operation for items enables some of these hidden relationships to be removed. Items make it difficult to analyse the structure of a whole application. To make the inherent structure of items clear, ‘objects’ are introduced as item building operators. The use of objects to build items enables the hidden links in the knowledge to be identified. A single operation for objects enables all of these hidden links to be removed from the conceptual model thus simplifying maintenance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barr, V. (1999). “Applying Reliability Engineering to Expert Systems” in proceedings 12th International FLAIRS Conference, Florida, May 1999, pp494–498.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Debenham, J. K. “Knowledge Engineering”, Springer-Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Debenham, J. K. “The Degradation of Knowledge Base Integrity”, in proceedings 13th International FLAIRS Conference FLAIRS-2000, Orlando, Florida, May 2000, pp113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Debenham, J. K. (1999). “Knowledge Object Decomposition” in proceedings 12th International FLAIRS Conference, Florida, May 1999, pp203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Debenham, J. K. “Representing Knowledge Normalisation”, in proceedings Tenth International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering SEKE’98, San Francisco, US, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Date, C. J., “An Introduction to Database Systems” (4th edition) Addison-Wesley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mayol, E. and Teniente, E. (1999). “Addressing Efficiency Issues During the Process of Integrity Maintenance” in proceedings Tenth International Conference DEXA99, Florence, September 1999, pp270–281.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramirez, J. and de Antonio, A. (2000). “Semantic Verification of Rule-Based Systems with Arithmetic Constraints” in proceedings 11th International Conference DEXA2000, London, September 2000, pp437–446.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Katsuno, H. and Mendelzon, A. O., “On the Difference between Updating a Knowledge Base and Revising It”, in proceedings Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR’91, Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, G. and Santos, E. (2000). “Generalizing Knowledge Representation Rules for Acquiring and Validating Uncertain Knowledge” in proceedings 13th International FLAIRS Conference, Florida, May 2000, pp186–2191.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Werner, E. “Logical Foundations of Distributed Arttificial Intelliegence” in O’Hare, G. M. P. & Jennings, N. R. (Eds) “Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligenece”, pp57–118, Wiley, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Darwiche, A. (1999). “Compiling Knowledge into Decomposable Negation Normal Form” in proceedings International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI’99, Stockholm, Sweden, August 1999, pp 284–289.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jantke, K. P. and Herrmann, J. (1999). “Lattices of Knowledge in Intelligent Systems Validation” in proceedings 12th International FLAIRS Conference, Florida, May 1999, pp499–505.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Debenham, J. (2001). Why Use a Unified Knowledge Representation?. In: Monostori, L., Váncza, J., Ali, M. (eds) Engineering of Intelligent Systems. IEA/AIE 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2070. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45517-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45517-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42219-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45517-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics