Abstract
The United States has traditionally restricted the export of strong encryption so as to keep the technology from criminal or enemy hands. This policy was, however, ineffective-those seeking strong encryption simply turned to non-US sources. Facing mounting legal and legislative challenges from the software industry and free speech advocates, in January of 2000 the Clinton administration finally relented and substantially liberalized its encryption export policy. In an interesting parallel, national security-obsessed Israel has also come to recognize that the security benefits of strict encryption regulation do not justify the economic costs. Indeed, though its regulations are comprehensive, Israel has permitted the export of strong encryption for years. Ultimately, then, the central question is now not whether governments will liberalize their policies, but rather how quickly international competition will force the pace of change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jolish, B.D. (2001). The Encryption Debate in Plaintext: National Security and Encryption in the United States and Israel. In: Frankel, Y. (eds) Financial Cryptography. FC 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1962. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45472-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45472-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42700-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45472-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive