Towards a Hybrid Symbolic/Numeric Computational Approach in Controller Design

  • Madhu Chetty
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2385)


Application of general computer algebra systems like MAPLE V® can prove advantageous over conventional ‘numerical’ simulation approach for controller design. In this paper, an approach for the application of hybrid symbolic/numeric computations to obtain explicit equations leading to the design of an output feedback controller is presented. The methodology for controller design using symbolic algebra is exemplified by considering the design of an excitation controller for a simplified model of the synchronous generator connected to an infinite bus. The output feedback controller is obtained from a symbolic full-state feedback controller by eliminating feedback from unmeasurable states using the free parameters in the symbolic feedback gain expressions. The entire analysis is carried out using the MATLAB® symbolic algebra toolbox that supports MAPLE V®.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. G.(Bram) de Jager, Applications of zero dynamics with symbolic computation, UKACC international conference on control’98, September 1998, pp. 1311–1316.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Baki and N. Munro, Implementation of balanced realisation algorithms in a symbolic environment, UKACC International conference on control’98, pp. 1317–1321.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Kontogiannis and N. Munro, The use of symbolic algebra in robust control, UKACC International conference on control’98, September 1998. pp. 1328–1332.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.J. Balance and W. Chen, Symbolic computation in value sets of plants with uncertain parameters, UKACC International Conference on Control’98, September 98, pp. 1322–1327.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.T. Soylemez and N. Munro, Pole assignment and symbolic algebra: A new way of thinking, UKACC International Conference on Control’98, September 1998, pp. 1306–1310.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Chetty and K.P Dabke, Symbolic computations: An overview and application to controller design, proceedings of international conference on Information, Decision and Control, Adelaide, 8th-10th February, 1999, pp. 451–456.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. P. Dabke, Linear control with incomplete state feedback and known initial-state statistics, Int. J. Control, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 133–141, 1970.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Zames, Input-Output Feedback Stability and Robustness, 1959-85, IEEE Control Systems, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 61–66, June 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Kailath, Linear systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood cliffs, New Jersey, 1980.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Porter and M.A. Woodhead, Performance of optimal control systems when some of the state variables are not measurable, Int. Jr. of Control, vol. 8, pp. 191–195, 1968.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Mathworks Inc., Symbolic math tool for use with MATLAB, user’s guide, Version 2.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.L. Kothari, J. Nanda and K. Bhattacharya, Discrete-mode power system stabilisers, Proc. IEE part-C, Generation Transmission and Distribution, November, 1993, pp. 523–531.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Aldeen and M. Chetty, A dynamic output power system stabiliser, Control’95, October 1997, vol. 2, pp. 575–579.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D.D. Moerder and A.J Calise, Convergence of a numerical algorithm for calculating optimal output feedback gains, IEEE Trans. On Automatic Control, Vol. AC-30, No. 9, pp. 900–903, September 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W.S. Levine and M. Athans, On the determination of optimal output feedback gains for linear multivariable systems, IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-15, pp.44–48, 1970.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.S Choi and H.R. Sirisena, Computation of optimal output feedback controls for unstable linear multivariable systems, IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-22, pp.134–136, Feb 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.M. Anderson and A.A. Fouad, Power system control and stability, New York, IEEE press, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madhu Chetty
    • 1
  1. 1.Gippsland School of Computing and Information TechnologyMonash UniversityChurchillAustralia

Personalised recommendations