Skip to main content

New Algorithms for Subset Query, Partial Match, Orthogonal Range Searching, and Related Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2380))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider the subset query problem, defined as follows: given a set \( \mathcal{P} \) of N subsets of a universe U, |U| = m, build a data structure, which for any query set QU detects if there is any P\( \mathcal{P} \) such that QP. This is essentially equivalent to the partial match problem and is a fundamental problem in many areas. In this paper we present the first (to our knowledge) algorithms, which achieve non-trivial space and query time bounds for m = W (log N). In particular, we present two algorithms with the following tradeoffs:

$$ --N \cdot 2^{O\left( {m log^2 m\sqrt {c/log N} } \right)} $$

space, and O(N/2c) time, for any c - Nmc space and O(mN/c) query time, for any c≤ N We extend these results to the more general problem of orthogonal range searching (both exact and approximate versions), approximate orthogonal range intersection and the exact and approximate versions of the nearest neighbor problem in l∞.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Adiseshu, S. Suri, and G. Parulkar. Packet Filter Management for Layer 4 Switching. Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Agarwal and J. Erickson. Geometric range searching and it’s relatives. Advances in Discrete and Computational Geometry, B. Chazelle, J. Goodman, and R. Pollack, eds., Contemporary Mathematics 223, AMS Press, pp. 1–56, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Arya and D. Mount. Approximate Range Searching Proceedings of 11th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 172–181, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Bloom. Space/time tradeoffs in hash coding with allowable errors. Communications of the ACM, 13(7):422–426, July 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Borodin, R. Ostrovsky, and Y. Rabani. Lower bounds for high dimensional nearest neighbor search and related problems. Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Eppstein and S. Muthukrishnan. Internet Packet Filter Management and Rectangle Geometry. Proceedings of 12th ACM-SIAM Symp. Discrete Algorithms 2001, pp. 827–835.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Feldmann and S. Muthukrishnan, Tradeoffs for Packet classification. Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 3:1193–1202. IEEE, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Gupta and N. McKeown. Algorithms for Packet Classification. IEEE Network Special Issue, March/April 2001, 15(2):24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Indyk. On approximate nearest neighbors in non-euclidean spaces. Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 148–155, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Indyk. High-dimensional computational geometry. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Indyk and R. Motwani. Approximate nearest neighbor: towards removing the curse of dimensionality. Proceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 604–613, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Kushilevitz, R. Ostrovsky, and Y. Rabani. Efficient search for approximate nearest neighbor in high dimensional spaces. Proceedings of the Thirtieth ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 614–623, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. S. Lueker. A data structure for orthogonal range queries. Proceedings of the Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. L. Rivest. Analysis of Associative Retrieval Algorithms. Stanford University, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. L. Rivest. Partial match retrieval algorithms. SIAM Journal on Computing 5 (1976), pp. 19–50.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Srinivasan, S. Suri, and G. Varghese. Packet classification using tuple space search. ACM Computer Communication Review 1999. ACM SIGCOMM’99, Sept. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Charikar, M., Indyk, P., Panigrahy, R. (2002). New Algorithms for Subset Query, Partial Match, Orthogonal Range Searching, and Related Problems. In: Widmayer, P., Eidenbenz, S., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Conejo, R., Hennessy, M. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2380. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45465-9_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45465-9_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43864-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45465-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics