Abstract
We prove upper and lower bounds on the power of quantum and stochastic branching programs of bounded width. We show any NC1 language can be accepted exactly by a width-2 quantum branching program of polynomial length, in contrast to the classical case where width 5 is necessary unless NC1 = ACC. This separates width-2 quantum programs from width-2 doubly stochastic programs as we show the latter cannot compute the middle bit of multiplication. Finally, we show that bounded-width quantum and stochastic programs can be simulated by classical programs of larger but bounded width, and thus are in NC1.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
F. Ablayev, A. Gainutdinova, and M. Karpinski. On computational Power of quantum branching programs. Proc. FCT 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2138: 59–70, 2001.
F. Ablayev and M. Karpinski. A lower bound for integer multiplication on randomized read-once branching programs. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity TR 98-011, 1998. http://www.eccc.uni-trier.de/eccc
P. Alexandrov. Introduction to set theory and general topology. Berlin, 1984.
A. Ambainis and R. Freivalds. 1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weakness, and generalizations. Proc. 39th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 332–342, 1998.
A. Ambainis, L. Schulman, and U. Vazirani. Computing with Highly Mixed States. Proc. 32nd Annual ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (STOC), 697–704, 2000.
D.A. Barrington. Bounded-width polynomial branching programs recognize exactly those languages in NC1. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 38(1): 150–164, 1989.
D.A. Barrington and D. Therien. Finite Monoids and the Fine Structure of NC1 Journal of the ACM 35(4): 941–952, 1988.
A. Kondacs and J. Watrous On the power of quantum finite automata. Proc. of the 38th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 66–75, 1997.
C. Moore and J.P. Crutchfield. Quantum automata and quantum grammars. Theoretical Computer Science 237: 275–306, 2000.
C. Moore, D. Thérien, F. Lemieux, J. Berman, and A. Drisko. Circuits and Expressions with Non-Associative Gates. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 60: 368–394, 2000.
M. Nakanishi, K. Hamaguchi, and T. Kashiwabara. Ordered quantum branching programs are more powerful than ordered probabilistic branching programs under a bounded-width restriction. Proc. 6th Annual International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics (COCOON) Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1858: 467–476, 2000.
M.A. Nielson and I.L. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press. 2000.
M. Rabin. Probabilistic automata. Information and Control 6: 230–245, 1963.
P. Shor. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Journal on Computing 26(5): 1484–1509, 1997.
Ingo Wegener. Branching Programs and Binary Decision Diagrams. SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications. 2000.
A.C. Yao. Lower Bounds by Probabilistic Arguments Proc. of the 24th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 420–428, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ablayev, F., Moore, C., Pollett, C. (2002). Quantum and Stochastic Branching Programs of Bounded Width. In: Widmayer, P., Eidenbenz, S., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Conejo, R., Hennessy, M. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2380. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45465-9_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45465-9_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43864-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45465-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive