Skip to main content

Some Ways that Maps and Diagrams Communicate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1849))

Abstract

Since ancient times, people have devised cognitive artifacts to extend memory and ease information processing. Among them are graphics, which use elements and the spatial relations among them to represent worlds that are actually or metaphorically spatial. Maps schematize the real world in that they are two-dimensional, they omit information, they regularize, they use inconsistent scale and perspective, and they exaggerate, fantasize, and carry messages. With little proding, children and adults use space and spatial relations to represent abstract relations, temporal, quantitative, and preference, in stereotyped ways, suggesting that these mappings are cognitively natural. Graphics reflect conceptions of reality, not reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnheim, R. (1977). The dynamics of architectural form. University of California Press: Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, T.J. (1998). Indigenous mapmaking in intertropical Africa. In Woodward, D. and Lewis, G.M. (Editors). History of cartography. Vol. 2 Book 3: Cartography in the traditional Africa, America, Arctic, Australian, and Pacific societies. Pp. 24–48. Chicago: Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beniger, J. R. & Robyn, D. L. (1978). Quantitative graphics in statistics. The American Statistician, 32, 1–11.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J. L. (1998). On the exactitude of science. Collected Fictions. P. 325. Translated by Andrew Hurley. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. Pp. 27–63. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L.A. (1989). Mental models of the structure of visual objects. In B. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process. (pp. 91–119). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freksa, C., Moratz, R. and Barkowsky, T. (2000). Schematic maps for robot navigation. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K.F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition II-Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal models, and practical applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, J.D. (1999). Expertise in the comprehension of architectural plans. In J. Gero and B. Tversky (Editors), Visual andspatial reasoning in design. Pp. 185–205. Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamustafan, A.T. (1992). Cosmographical diagrams. Celestial mapping. In Harley, J. B. and Woodward, D. (Editors) The history of cartography. Vol. 2. Book One Cartography in the traditional Islamic and South Asian Societies. Pp. 71–89. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, B.E. (1998). Mesoamerican cartography. In Woodward, D. and Lewis, G. M. (Editors). History of cartography. Vol. 2 Book 3: Cartography in the traditional Africa, America, Arctic, Australian, and Pacific societies. Pp. 183–256. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, M. and Southworth, S. (1982). Maps: A visual survey and design guide. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrower, N.J.W. (1996). Maps and civilization: Cartography in culture and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E.R. (1990) Envisioning Information. Cheshire: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (1995). Cognitive origins of graphic conventions. In F. T. Marchese (Editor). Understanding images. Pp. 29–53. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (In press, a). Levels and structure of cognitive mapping. In R. Kitchin and S. M. Freundschuh (Editors). Cognitive mapping: Past, present and future. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (In press, b). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Editor), Spatial schemas and abstract thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S. and Winter, A. (1991) Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tversky, B. (2000). Some Ways that Maps and Diagrams Communicate. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Brauer, W., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1849. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45460-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45460-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67584-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45460-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics