Advertisement

Who, What, When, Where, How: Design Issues of Capture & Access Applications

  • Khai N. Truong
  • Gregory D. Abowd
  • Jason A. Brotherton
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2201)

Abstract

One of the general themes in ubiquitous computing is the construction of devices and applications to support the automated capture of live experiences and the future access of those records. Over the past five years, our research group has developed many different capture and access applications. In this paper, we present an overview of six of these applications. We discuss the different design issues encountered while creating each of these applications and share our approaches to solving these issues (in comparison and in contrast with other work found in the literature). From these issues we define the large design space for automated capture and access. This design space may then serve as a point of reference for designers to extract the requirements for systems to be developed in the future.

Keywords

Design Space Design Issue Ubiquitous Computing Access Device Live Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abowd, G. D., Classroom 2000: An experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. IBM Systems Journal. 38(4) (1999) 508–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bacher, C., et al. Authoring on the Fly. A New Way of Integrating Telepresentation and Courseware Production. In Proceedings of ICCE 1997. Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berque, D. Using a Variation of the WYSIWIS Shared Drawing Surface Paradigm to Support Electronic Classrooms. In Proceedings of HCI International 1999. Munich, Germany (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bianchi, M. AutoAuditorium: A Fully Automatic, Multi-Camera System to Televise Auditorium Presentations. In Proceedings of DARPA/NIST Smart Spaces Technology Workshop. (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Black, M. J., et al. The Digital Office: Overview. In Proceedings of 1998 AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Environments. (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brotherton, J. A., Abowd, G. D., and Truong, K. N. Supporting Capture and Access Interfaces for Informal and Opportunistic Meetings. Georgia Institute of Technology Technical Report GIT-GVU-99-06 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brotherton, J. A., Bhalodia, J. R., and Abowd, G. D. Automated Capture, Integration, and Visualization of Multiple Media Streams. In Proceedings of IEEE Multimedia and Computing Systems. Austin, TX (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bush, V.: As We May Think, in Atlantic Monthly. (1945)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chiu, P., et al. NoteLook: Taking Notes in Meetings with Digital Video and Ink. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 1999. Orlando, FL (1999) 149–158Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis, R. C., et al. NotePals: Lightweight Note Sharing by the Group, for the Group. In Proceedings of CHI 1999. Pittsburgh, PA (1999) 338–345Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dey, A. K., et al. The Conference Assistant: Combining Context-Awareness with Wearable Computing. In Proceedings of ISWC 1999. San Francisco, CA (1999) 21–28Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elrod, S., et al. Liveboard: A large interactive display supporting group meetings, presentations and remote collaboration. In Proceedings of CHI 1992. Monterey, CA (1992) 599–607Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ginsberg, A. and Ahuja, S. Automating envisionment of virtual meeting room histories. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 1995. San Francisco, CA (1995) 65–76Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grudin, J.: Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers, in Communications of the ACM. (1994). p. 92–105Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hindus, D. and Schmandt, C. Ubiquitous Audio: Capturing Spontaneous Collaboration. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Work 1992. Toronto, Canada (1992) 210–217Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kazman, R., et al. SAAM: A Method for Analyzing the Properties of Software Architectures. In Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 16). (1994) 81–90Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Minneman, S. and Harrison, S. Where were we: Making and using nearsynchronous, pre-narrative video. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 1993. (1993) 1–6Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Minneman, S., et al. A confederation of tools for capturing and acessing collaborative activity. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 1995. San Francisco, CA (1995) 523–534Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moran, T. P., et al. “I'll Get That off the Audio”: A Case Study of Salvaging Multimedia Meeting Records. In Proceedings of CHI 1997. Atlanta, GA (1997) 202–209Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mukhopadhyay, S. and Smith, B. Passive Capture and Structuring of Lectures. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 1999. Orlando, FL (1999) 477–487Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Myers, B. A., Stiel, H., and Gargiulo, R. Collaboration Using Multiple PDAs Connected to a PC. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1998. Seattle, WA (1998) 285–294Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mynatt, E. D., et al. Flatland: New Dimensions in Office Whiteboards. In Proceedings of CHI 1999. Pittsburgh, PA (1999) 346–353Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Newman, W. and Wellner, P. A Desk Supporting Computer-based Interaction with Paper Documents. In Proceedings of CHI 1992. Monterey, CA (1992) 587–592Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pedersen, E. R., et al. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI 1993. Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1993) 391–398Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Richter, H., et al. Integrating Meeting Capture within a Collaborative Team Environment. In Proceedings of UbiComp 2001. Atlanta, GA (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Richter, H., Schuchhard, P., and Abowd, G. D. Automated capture and retrieval of architectural rationale. Georgia Institute of Technology Technical Report GIT-GVU-98-37 (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smart Technologies, Inc. SmartBoard. http://www.smarttech.com.
  28. 28.
    Stafford-Fraser, Q., et al. BrightBoard: A Video-Augmented Environment. In Proceedings of CHI 1996. Vancouver, Canada (1996) 134–141Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stifelman, L. J. The Audio Notebook. Ph.D. Thesis, Media Laboratory, MIT (1997)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Streitz, N. A., et al. DOLPHIN: Integrated Meeting Support across Liveboards, Local and Remote Desktop Environments. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Work 1994. Chapel Hill, NC (1994) 345–357Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Truong, K. N., Abowd, G. D., and Brotherton, J. A. Personalizing the Capture of Public Experiences. In Proceedings of UIST 1999. Asheville, NC (1999) 121–130Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wactlar, H., et al. Informedia Experience-on-Demand, Capturing, Integrating and Communication Experience across People, Time and Space. http://www.informedia.cs.cmu.edu/eod.
  33. 33.
    Weber, K. and Poon, A. Marquee: A tool for real-time video logging. In Proceedings of CHI 1994. Boston, MA (1994) 58–64Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weiser, M., The computing for the 21st century. Scientific American. 265(3) (1991) 94–104Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Whittaker, S., Hyland, P., and Wiley, M. Filochat: Handwritten notes provide access to recorded conversations. In Proceedings of CHI 1994. Boston, MA (1994) 271–277Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilcox, L., Schilit, B. N., and Sawhney, N. Dynomite: A Dynamically Organized Ink and Audio Notebook. In Proceedings of CHI 1997. Atlanta, GA (1997) 186–193Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khai N. Truong
    • 1
  • Gregory D. Abowd
    • 1
  • Jason A. Brotherton
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Computing & GVU CenterGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations