Abstract
This paper discusses the ontological status of remote sensing images, from a GIScience perspective. We argue that images have a dual nature—they are fields at the measurement level and fiat objects at the classification level—and that images have an ontological description of their own, distinct and independent from the domain ontology a domain scientist uses. This paper proposes a multi-level ontology for images, combining both field and object approaches and distinguishing between image and user ontologies. The framework developed contributes to the design of a new generation of integrated GISs, since two key benefits are achieved: (1) the support for multiple perspectives for the same image and (2) an emphasis on using images for the detection of spatial-temporal configurations of geographic phenomena.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Goodchild, M., et al., Introduction to the Varenius Project. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1999. 13(8): p. 731–745.
Fonseca, F. and M. Egenhofer. Ontology-Driven Geographic Information Systems. in 7th ACM Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 1999. Kansas City, MO: ACM Press, N.Y.
Couclelis, H., People Manipulate Objects (but Cultivate Fields): Beyond the Raster-Vector Debate in GIS, in Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, A. Frank, I. Campari, and U. Formentini, Editors. 1992, Springer-Verlag: Berlin. p. 65–77.
Burrough, P. and A. Frank, eds. Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries. 1996, Taylor & Francis: London.
Câmara, G., et al., SPRING: Integrating Remote Sensing and GIS with Object-Oriented Data Modelling. Computers and Graphics, 1996. 15(6): p. 13–22.
Peuquet, D., A Conceptual Framework and Comparison of Spatial Data Models. Cartographica, 1984. 21: p. 66–113.
Smith, B. and D. Mark. Ontology and Geographic Kinds. in International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. 1998. Vancouver, Canada.
Guarino, N., Formal Ontology and Information Systems, in Formal Ontology in Information Systems, N. Guarino, Editor. 1998, IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p. 3–15.
Fonseca, F., et al., Ontologies and Knowledge Sharing in Urban GIS. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, 2000. 24(3): p. 232–251.
Mark, D., et al., Ontological Foundations for Geographic Information Science. 2001.
Winter, S., ed. Geographical Domain and Geographical Information Systems-EuroConference on Ontology and Epistemology for Spatial Data Standards. GeoInfo Series. Vol. 19. 2000, Institute for Geoinformation, Vienna University of Technology: Vienna, Austria.
Gregorio, A. and L. Jansen, Land Cover Classification System: Classification Concepts and User Manual. 1998, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO/UN): Rome, Italy.
Câmara, G., et al. A Model to Cultivate Objects and Manipulate Fields. in Second ACM Workshop on Geographic Information Systems. 1994. Gaithersburg, MD: ACM Press.
Lillesand, T. and R. Kiefer, Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 2000, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Jensen, J., Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. 1986, New York: Prentice-Hall.
Bittner, T. and S. Winter, On Ontology in Image Analysis, in Integrated Spatial Databases: Digital Images and GIS, P. Agouris and A. Stefanidis, Editors. 1999, Springer-Verlag: Berlin. p. 168–191.
Câmara, G.M., A.M.V.; Paiva, J.A.C; Souza, R.C.M. Action-Driven Ontologies of the Geographical Space. in GIScience 2000. 2000. Savanah, GA: AAG.
Marr, D., Vision. 1982, San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
Guarino, N., Semantic Matching: Formal Ontological Distinctions for Information Organization, Extraction, and Integration., in Information Extraction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology, International Summer School, SCIE-97, M. Pazienza, Editor. 1997, Springer-Verlag: Berlin. p. 139–170.
Turner, B., et al., Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC): Science/Research Plan, HDP Report No. 7. 1995, IGBP Secretariat: Stockholm.
Shimabukuro, Y., et al., Using shade fraction image segmentation to evaluate deforestation in Landsat Thematic Mapper images of the Amazon region. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998. 19(3): p. 535–541.
Hornsby, K. and M. Egenhofer, Identity-Based Change: A Foundation for Spatio-Temporal Knowledge Representation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2000. 14(3): p. 207–224.
Egenhofer, M. and R. Franzosa, Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1991. 5(2): p. 161–174.
Ehlers, M., G. Edwards, and Y. Bédard, Integration of Remote Sensing with Geographic Information Systems: A Necessary Evolution. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 1989. 55(11): p. 1619–1627.
Hinton, J., GIS and Remote Sensing Integration for Environmental Applications. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1996. 10(7): p. 877–890.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Câmara, G., Egenhofer, M.J., Fonseca, F., Vieira Monteiro, A.M. (2001). What’s in an Image?. In: Montello, D.R. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2205. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42613-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45424-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive