Advertisement

The Role of a Self-Reference System in Spatial Navigation

  • M. Jeanne Sholl
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2205)

Abstract

The self-reference system architecture developed to explain the retrieval of spatial knowledge from long-term memory is reviewed and expanded to include navigational tracking as one of its operations. A distinction is made between the operation of the self-reference system at a perceptual-motor and a representational level, and a case is made that if a representational self-reference system is to function as a navigational tracking device, it must be closely connected with the perceptual-motor level. Existing empirical evidence is reviewed and new empirical evidence is reported that explores the connections between the two levels of functioning. Additionally, the operations that would enable a self-reference system to function as a tracking device are derived from an animal model of sense of direction. The ideas explored in this manuscript rely on the premise that spatial memory systems evolved in the service of spatial navigation.

Keywords

Self-reference system navigational tracking device cognitive map geocentric heading path integration inertial dead reckoning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Franklin, N., Henkel, L. A., & Zangas, T. (1995). Parsing surrounding space into regions. Memory and Cognition, 23, 397–407.Google Scholar
  4. Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Gollege, R. G., Cincinelli, J. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Fry, P. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. May, M. (2000, November). Imaginal repositioning in space: Transformation versus interference accounts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  8. McNaughton, B. L., Chen, L. L., & Markus, E. J. (1991). “Dead reckoning,” landmark learning, and the sense of direction: A neurophysiological and computational hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Paillard, J. (1991). Motor and representational framing of space. In J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and space (pp. 163–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Pellegrino, J. W., & Kail, R.J. (1982). Process analysis of spatial aptitude. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 311–365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Poltrock, S. E., & Brown, P. (1984). Individual differences in visual imagery and spatial ability. Intelligence, 8, 93–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shepard, R. N., & Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition, 18, 161–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sholl, M. J. (1995). The representation and retrieval of map and environment knowledge. Geographical systems, 2, 177–195.Google Scholar
  16. Sholl, M. J. (2000). The functional separability of self-reference and object-to-object systems in spatial memory. In S. O’Nuallain. (Ed.), Spatial Cognition: Foundations and Applications: Proceedings of the Mind III, Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society of Ireland, 1998. (pp. 45–67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Sholl, M. J., & Nolin, T. L. (1997). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1494–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Jeanne Sholl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBoston CollegeChestnut Hill

Personalised recommendations