Skip to main content

Time Delay and Tunneling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modern Challenges in Quantum Optics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 575))

  • 514 Accesses

Abstract

A brief critical surveyis given of the main approaches to the tunneling time problem: when a particle has tunneled through a one-dimensional barrier, how long did it take to cross it? A new approach, based on Faddeev’s formulation of onedimensional scattering and on the evaluation of the average dwell time for an arbitrary wave packet, indicates that the problem is ill-posed. Furthermore, observations of apparent superluminal propagation do not violate causality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. H. Hauge and J. A. Støvneng: Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 917 (1989); R. Landauer and Th. Martin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 217 (1994); R. Y. Chiao and A. M. Steinberg, in: Progress in Optics, ed. by E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997), vol. 37, p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. M. Nussenzveig: Phys. Rev. A 62, 042107–1 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Lamb: Hydrodynamics, 6th edn.(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1953), p. 395.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wigner, E. P., 1955 Phys. Rev. 98, 145.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. E. Hartman: J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3427 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Landauer and Th. Martin: Solid State Commun. 84, 115 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. C. T. da Costa: J. Math. Phys. 11, 2799 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. I. Baz, Yad. Fiz. 4, 252 (1967) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 4, 229 (1967)]; V. F. Rybachenko, ibid. 5, 895 (1967) [ibid. 5, 635 (1967)].

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. BĂĽttiker: Phys. Rev. B 27, 6178 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Landauer and Th. Martin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 217 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. F. T. Smith: Phys. Rev. 118, 349 (1960).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. H. M. Nussenzveig: Phys. Rev. 177, 1848 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. BĂĽttiker and R. Landauer: Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1739 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. BĂĽttiker and R. Landauer: Phys. Scr. 32, 429 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Aharonov, D. Z. Albert and L. Vaidman: Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman: Phys. Rev. A 14, 11 (1990).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. A. M. Steinberg: Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2405 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Sokolovski and L. M. Baskin: Phys. Rev. A 36, 4604 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. H. A. Fertig: Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2321 (1990).

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Yamada: Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3350 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. C. R. Leavens and G. C. Aers, in: Scanning Tunneling Microscopy III, eds. R. Wiesendanger and H. J. GĂĽntherodt (Springer, New York, 1993), p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. M. Nussenzveig: Phys. Rev. D 6, 1534 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Froissart, M. L. Goldberger and K. M. Watson: Phys. Rev. 131, (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. M. Nussenzveig: Phys. Rev. A 55, 1012 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. L. D. Faddeev: Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov 73, 314 (1964) [Am. Math. Soc. Transl. 2, 139 (1964)]; K. Chadan and P. C. Sabatier: Inverse Problems in Quantum Scattering Theory, 2nd. ed. (Springer, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. H. Hauge, J. P. Falck and T. A. Fjeldly: Phys. Rev. B 36, 4203 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Iannaconne, in: Tunneling and its Implications, ed. by D. Mugnai, A. Ranfagni and L. S. Schulman (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. G. van Kampen: Phys. Rev. 91, 1267 (1953).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Z. Huang and C. M. Wang: J. Phys. Condens. Matter 3, 5915 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Friedel: Philos. Mag. 43, 153 (1952). R. Balian and C. Bloch: Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 85, 514 (1974).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nussenzweig, H. (2001). Time Delay and Tunneling. In: Orszag, M., Retamal, J.C. (eds) Modern Challenges in Quantum Optics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 575. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45409-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45409-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41957-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45409-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics