Skip to main content

Strong Equivalence for Logic Programs and Default Theories (Made Easy)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic Programming and Nonmotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2173))

Abstract

Logic programs P and Q are strongly equivalent if, given any logic program R, programs PR and QR are equivalent (that is, have the same answer sets). Strong equivalence is convenient for the study of equivalent transformations of logic programs: one can prove that a local change is correct without considering the whole program. Recently, Lifschitz, Pearce andV alverde showedt hat Heyting’s logic of here-and-there can be used to characterize strong equivalence of logic programs. This paper offers a more direct characterization, and extends it to default logic. In their paper, Lifschitz, Pearce and Valverde study a very general form of logic programs, called“n ested” programs. For the study of strong equivalence of default theories, it is convenient to introduce a corresponding “nested” version of default logic, which generalizes Reiter’s default logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Michael Gelfondan d Vladimir Lifschitz. Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing, 9:365–385, 1991. 81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Michael Gelfond, Vladimir Lifschitz, Halina Przymusińska, and Miroslaw Truszczyński. Disjunctive defaults. In James Allen, Richard Fikes, and Erik Sandewall, editors, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proc. of the 2nd Int’l Conference, pages 230–237, 1991. 82, 87, 88

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vladimir Lifschitz, L. R. Tang, and Hudson Turner. Nested expressions in logic programs. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 25(2-3):369–390, 1999. 81, 82, 83, 86, 91

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Vladimir Lifschitz, David Pearce, and Agustín Valverde. Strongly equivalent logic programs. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, To appear, 2001. (Pre-print version available at http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/vl/papers.html.) 81, 84

  5. David Pearce. A new logical characterization of stable models andan swer sets. In Jürgen Dix, Luis Pereira, and Teodor Przymusinski, editors, Non-Monotonic Extensions of Logic Programming (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1216), pages 57–70. Springer-Verlag, 1997. 81

    Google Scholar 

  6. David P earce. From here to there: stable negation in logic programming. In D. Gabbay and H. Wansing, editors, What is Negation? Kluwer, 1999. 81

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raymond R eiter. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13(1,2):81–132, 1980. 81

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Turner, H. (2001). Strong Equivalence for Logic Programs and Default Theories (Made Easy). In: Eiter, T., Faber, W., Truszczyński, M.l. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2173. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45402-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45402-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42593-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45402-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics