Skip to main content

Endpoint Admission Control over Assured Forwarding PHBs and Its Performance over RED Implementations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2170))

Abstract

The Assured Forwarding Per Hop Behavior (AF PHB) has been devised by the IETF Differentiated Services (DiffServ) working group to provide drop level differentiation. The intent of AF is to support services with different loss requirements, but with no strict delay and jitter guarantees. Another suggested use of AF is to provide differentiated support for traffic conforming to an edge conditioning/policing scheme with respect to nonconforming traffic.

Scope of this paper is twofold. First, we show that, quite surprisingly, a standard AF PHB class is semantically capable of supporting per flow admission control. This is obtained by adopting the AF PHB as core routers forwarding mechanism in conjunction with an End Point Admission Control mechanism running at the network edge nodes. The performance achieved by our proposed approach depend on the specific AF PHB implementation running in the core routers.

In the second part of the paper, we prove that changes in the customary AF PHB implementations are indeed required to achieve strict QoS performance. To prove this point, we have evaluated the performance of our admission control scheme over a simple AF implementation based on RED queues. Our results show that, regardless of the selected RED thresholds configuration, such an implementation is never capable of guaranteeing tight QoS support, but is limited to provide better than best effort performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. Almesberger, T. Ferrari, J. Y. Le Boudec: “SRP: a Scalable Resource Reservation Protocol for the Internet”, IWQoS’98, Napa (California), May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Bianchi, N. Blefari-Melazzi: “A Migration Path for the Internet: from Best-Effort to a QoS Capable Infrastructure by means of Localized Admission Control”, Lecture Notes on Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, volume 1989, January 2001 (a more detailed technical report can be found at http://drake.diei.unipg.it/netweb/GRIP-tech-rep.pdf).

  3. G. Bianchi, N. Blefari-Melazzi: “Admission Control over AF PHB groups”, internet draft, http://draft-bianchi-blefari-admcontr-over-af-phb.txt, March 2001, work in progress.

  4. G. Bianchi, A. Capone, C. Petrioli, “Packet Management Techniques for Measurement Based End-to-end Admission Control”, KICS/IEEE Journal on Communications and Networking, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Breslau, S. Jamin, S. Schenker: “Comments on the performance of measurement-based admission control algorithms”, Proc. of IEEE Infocom 2000, Tel-Aviv, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Borgonovo, A. Capone, L. Fratta, M. Marchese, C. Petrioli, “PCP: A Bandwidth Guaranteed Transport Service for IP networks”, IEEE ICC’99, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Breslau, E. W. Knightly, S. Schenker, I. Stoica, H. Zhang: “Endpoint Admission Control: Architectural Issues and Performance”, ACM SIGCOMM 2000, Stockholm, Sweden, August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cisco IOS Quality of Service Solutions Configuration Guide-Online Manual. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/qos-c/

  9. C. Cetinkaya, E. Knightly, “Egress Admission Control”, Proc. of IEEE Infocom 2000, Tel-Aviv, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Elek, G. Karlsson, “Admission Control Based on End-to-End Measurements”, Proc. of IEEE Infocom 2000, Tel Aviv, Israel, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Floyd and V. Jacobson. “Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance”. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 397–413, August 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. J. Gibbens, F. P. Kelly, “Distributed Connection Acceptance Control for a Connectionless Network”, 16th ITC, Edimburgh, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Grossglauser, D. N. C. Tse: “A Framework for Robust Measurement Based Admission Control”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 7, No. 3, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. P. Kelly, P. B. Key, S. Zachary: “Distributed Admission Control”, IEEE JSAC, Vol. 18, No. 12, December 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Mortier, I. Pratt, C. Clark, S. Crosby: “Implicit Admission Control”, IEEE JSAC, Vol. 18, No. 12, December 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Nichols, B. Carpenter, “Definition of Differentiated Services Per Domain Behaviors and Rules for their Specification”, http://draft-ietf-diffservpdb-def-03, January 2001, Work in progress.

  17. R. Braden, L Zhang, S. Berson, S. Herzog, S. Jamin, “Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP)-Version 1 Functional Specification”, RFC 2205, September 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Wroclawsky, “The use of RSVP with IETF Integrated Services”, RFC2210, September 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, D. Black, “Definitions of the Differentiated Service Field (DS Field) in the Ipv4 and Ipv6 Headers”, RFC2474, December 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Blade, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, W. Weiss, “An Architecture for Differentiated Services”, RFC2475, December 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Heinanen, F. Baker, W. Weiss, J. Wroclavski “Assured Forwarding PHB Group”, RFC 2597, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Huston, “Next Steps for the IP QoS Architecture”, RFC2990, November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bernet, Y., Yavatkar, R., Ford, P., Baker, F., Zhang, L., Speer, M., Braden, R., Davie, B., Wroclawski, J. And E. Felstaine, “A Framework for Integrated Services Operation Over DiffServ Networks”, RFC 2998, November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. Stoica, H. Zhang, “Providing guaranteed services without per flow management”, Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM 1999, Cambridge, MA, September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bianchi, G., Blefari-Melazzi, N., Mancuso, V. (2001). Endpoint Admission Control over Assured Forwarding PHBs and Its Performance over RED Implementations. In: Palazzo, S. (eds) Evolutionary Trends of the Internet. IWDC 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2170. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45400-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45400-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42592-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45400-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics