Advertisement

2s Hyperfine Structure in Hydrogen Atom and Helium-3 Ion

  • Savely G. Karshenboim
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 570)

Abstract

The usefulness of study of hyperfine splitting in the hydrogen atom is limited on a level of 10 ppm by our knowledge of the proton structure. One way to go beyond 10 ppm is to study a specific difference of the hyperfine structure intervals Δv2 - Δv1. Nuclear effects for are not important this difference and it is of use to study higher-order QED corrections.

Keywords

Vacuum Polarization Logarithmic Correction Deuterium Atom Lamb Shift Muonic Hydrogen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. G. Karshenboim: invited talk at ICAP 2000, to be published, e-print hepph/ 0007278Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Jungmann: this edition, pp. 81–102Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Conti: this edition, pp. 103–121Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Pohl et al.: this edition, pp. 454–466Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Jungmann, V. G. Ivanov and S. G. Karshenboim: this edition, pp. 446–453Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. E. Rothery and E. A. Hessels: presented at this conference (unpublished)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. A. Schluessler, E. N. Forton and H. G. Dehmelt: Phys. Rev. 187, 5 (1969)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. H. Prior and E.C. Wang: Phys. Rev. A 16, 6 (1977)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Hellwig et al.: IEEE Trans. IM 19, 200 (1970); P. W. Zitzewitz et al.: Rev. Sci. Instr. 41, 81 (1970); D. Morris: Metrologia 7, 162 (1971); L. Essen et al.: Metrologia 9, 128 (1973); J. Vanier and R. Larouche: Metrologia 14, 31 (1976); Y. M. Cheng et al.: IEEE Trans. IM 29, 316 (1980); P. Petit, M. Desaintfuscien and C. Audoin: Metrologia 16, 7 (1980)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. W. Heberle, H. A. Reich and P. Kush: Phys. Rev. 101, 612 (1956)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. A. Reich, J. W. Heberle, and P. Kush: Phys. Rev. 104, 1585 (1956)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. J. Wineland and N. F. Ramsey: Phys. Rev. 5, 821 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Novick and D. E. Commins: Phys. Rev. 111, 822 (1958)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Zwanziger: Phys. Rev. 121, 1128 (1961)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Sternheim: Phys. Rev. 130, 211 (1963)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. F. Blundell, K. T. Cheng and J. Sapirstein: Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4914 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. G. Karshenboim, V. G. Ivanov and V. M Shabaev: Can. J. Phys. 76, 503 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Kinoshita and M. Nio: Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3803 (1994)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. I. Eides and V. A. Shelyuto: Pis’ma ZhETF 61, 465 (1995), JETP Lett. 61, 478 (1995); Phys. Rev. A52, 954 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. G. Karshenboim: ZhETF 103, 1105 (1993) /in Russian/; JETP 76 (1993) 541; Z. Phys. D36, 11 (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Arnowitt: Phys. Rev. 92, 1002 (1953); A. Newcomb and E. E. Salpeter: Phys. Rev. 97, 1146 (1955)zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Breit: Phys. Rev. 35, 1477 (1930)ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. G. Karshenboim: Phys. Lett. A 225, 97 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. G. Karshenboim: Z. Phys. D39, 109 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. J. Mohr and B. N. Taylor: this edition, pp. 145–156Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Savely G. Karshenboim
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.D. I. Mendeleev Institute for MetrologySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institut für QuantenoptikGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations