The M*-COMPLEX Approach to Enterprise Modeling, Engineering, and Integration

  • Giuseppe Berio
  • Antonio Di Leva
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1921)


A hot topic on the agenda of corporate management in order to improve the enterprise competitiveness factors concerns the operational, even continuos and rapid, transformation of business processes, support interoperability and integration with other business partners. The paper overviews though a simple case study concerning the definition of a virtual enterprise, the methodology M*-COMPLEX (extending authors previous word on M*-OBJECT) for design of process centered highly complex systems and its supporting tool M*-PROCESS.


Business Process Virtual Enterprise Enterprise Modeling Validation Task Call Work Center 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Karagiannis, D., (ed.): Special Issue in Business Process Reengineering. In SIGOIS Bulletin, Vol. 16, N.1 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hsu, C., Rattner, L.: Information modelling for computerized manufacturing. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 20, N.4 (1990) 758–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rumbaugh, J., et al: Object Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice Hall (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rumbaugh, J., et al.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ESPRIT Consortium AMICE (eds.): CIMOSA, Open System Architecture for CIM. 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheer, A. W.: ARIS-Business Process Frameworks. Springer Verlag (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berio, G., Di Leva, A., Giolito, P., Vernadat, F.: The M*-OBJECT methodology for information system design in CIM environments. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man,and Cybernetics, Vol. 25, N.1 (1995) 68–85Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berio, G., Di Leva, A., Giolito, P., Vernadat, F.: Process and Data Nets: The conceptual model of the M*-OBJECT methodology. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, Vol. 28, N. 1 (1999) 104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 10.
    Mayer, R. J.: The IDEF Suite of Methods for System Development and Evolution. Technical Report, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433-6503 (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Harel, D., Naamad, A.: The STATEMATE Semantics of Statecharts. In ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Vol.4, N.5 (1996) 293–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 12.
    Brauer, W., Reisig, W., Rozemberg, G., (eds.): Petri Nets: Central Models and their Properties. Advances in Petri Nets, Part I and II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vols.254, 255. Springer Verlag, Berlin (1987)Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Berio, G., Vernadat, F.: Une Méthode de Spécification du Comportement des Systèmes Réactifs de Production. In Proceedings 2ème Conférence Francophone de Modélisation et Simulation (MOSIM'99) (1999) 185–190Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Vernadat, F.: Enterprise Modeling and Integration: Principles and Applications. Chapman & Hall, London (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Berio, G., Vernadat, F.: Formal Foundations for a Process/Resource Approach in Manufacturing Systems Behaviour Modelling. In Proceedings 14th IFAC World Congress (IFAC'99) (1999) 181–186Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Berio
    • 1
  • Antonio Di Leva
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations