Skip to main content

Hybrid Geodesics as Optimal Solutions to the Collision-Free Motion Planning Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2034))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we address the problem of designing energy minimizing collision-free maneuvers for multiple agents moving on a plane. We show that the problem is equivalent to that of finding the shortest geodesic in a certain manifold with nonsmooth boundary. This allows us to prove that the optimal maneuvers are C1 by introducing the concept of u-convex manifolds. Moreover, due to the nature of the optimal maneuvers, the problem can be formulated as an optimal control problem for a certain hybrid system whose discrete states consist of different “contact graphs”. We determine the analytic expression for the optimal maneuvers in the two agents case. For the three agents case, we derive the dynamics of the optimal maneuvers within each discrete state. This together with the fact that an optimal maneuver is a C1 concatenation of segments associated with different discrete states gives a characterization of the optimal solutions in the three agents case.

Research supported by NSF and DARPA. The authors would like to thank Ekaterina Lemch for the helpful discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Albrecht and I.D. Berg. Geodesics in Euclidean space with analytic obstacle. Proceedings of the American Mathematics Society, 113(1):201–207, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Alexander and S. Alexander. Geodesics in Riemannian manifolds-withboundary. Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 30(4):481–488, 1981.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. S.B. Alexander, I.D. Berg, and R.L. Bishop. Cauchy uniqueness in the Riemannian obstacle problem. In Lecture notes in Math., vol.1209, pag.1–7. Springer-Verlag, 1985.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bicchi and L. Pallottino. Optimal planning for coordinated vehicles with bounded curvature. In Proc. Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics, Dartmouth, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.P. de Carmo. Riemannian geometry. Birkhäuser Boston, 1992.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Durand, J.M. Alliot, and J. Noailles. Automatic aircraft conflict resolution using genetic algorithms. In 11th Annual ACM Conf. on Applied Computing, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Erdmann and T. Lozano-Perez. On multiple moving objects (motion planning). Algorithmica, 2(4):477–521, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Frazzoli, Z.H. M ao, J.H. Oh, and E. Feron. Resolution of conflicts involving many aircraft via semidefinite programming. AIAA J. of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Fujimura. Motion planning in dynamic environments. Springer-Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Hu, M. Prandini, and S. Sastry. Optimal coordinated maneuvers for multiple agents moving on a plane. Technical report, Univ. of California at Berkeley, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Hu, M. Prandini, and S. Sastry. Optimal maneuver for multiple aircraft conflict resolution: a braid point of view. In IEEE 39th Conf. on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Hu and S. Sastry. Geodesics in manifolds with boundary: a case study. In preparation, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Kuchar and L.C. Yang. Survey of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods. In AIAA Guidance, Navig., and Control Conf., New Orleans, LA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.-C. Latombe. Robot motion planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.M. LaValle and S.A. Hutchinson. Optimal motion planning for multiple robots having independent goals. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Aut., 14(6):912–925, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Lygeros, G.J. Pappas, and S. Sastry. An introduction to hybrid systems modeling, analysis and control. In Preprints of the First Nonlinear Control Network Pedagogical School, pag. 307–329, Athens, Greece, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.K. Menon, G.D. Sweriduk, and B. Sridhar. Optimal strategies for free-flight air traffic conflict resolution. AIAA J. of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 22(2):202–211, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Miele, T. Wang, C.S. Chao, and J.B. Dabney. Optimal control of a ship for collision avoidance maneuvers. J. of Optim. Theory and App., 103(3):495–519, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J.W. Milnor. Morse theory. Annals of mathematics studies, 51. Princeton University Press, 1963. Based on lecture notes by M. Spivak and R. Wells.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics. Minimum aviation system performance standards for automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B). Technical report, RTCA-186, 1997. DRAFT 4.0.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Simic, K.H. Johansson, S. Sastry, and J. Lygeros. Towards a geometric theory of hybrid systems. Hybrid Systems: Computations and Control. Third International Workshop, 2000. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, number 1790.

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Vronov, M. de Berg, A.F. van der Stappen, P. Svestka, and J. Vleugels. Motion planning for multiple robots. Discrete & Comput. Geometry, 22(4):502–525, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hu, J., Prandini, M., Johansson, K.H., Sastry, S. (2001). Hybrid Geodesics as Optimal Solutions to the Collision-Free Motion Planning Problem. In: Di Benedetto, M.D., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (eds) Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. HSCC 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2034. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45351-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45351-2_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41866-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45351-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics