Skip to main content

Proving the Correctness of Optimising Destructive and Non-destructive Reads over Tuple Spaces

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1906))

Abstract

In this paper we describe the proof of an optimisation that can be applied to tuple space based run-time systems (as used in Linda). The optimisation allows, under certain circumstances, for a tuple that has been destructively removed from a shared tuple space (for example, by a Linda in) to be returned as the result for a non-destructive read (for example, a Linda rd) for a different process. The optimisation has been successfully used in a prototype run-time system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Rowstron. Optimising the Linda in primitive: Understanding tuple-space runtimes. In J. Carroll, E. Damiani, H. Haddad, and D. Oppenheim, editors, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, volume 1, pages 227–232. ACM Press, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sun Microsystems. Javaspace specification. available at: http://java.sun.com/, 1999.

  3. R. De Nicola, G. Ferrari, and R. Pugliese. KLAIM: A kernel language for agents interaction and mobility. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(5):315–330, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Carriero and D. Gelernter. Linda in context. Communications of the ACM, 32(4):444–458, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Ciancarini, R. Tolksdorf, F. Vitali, D. Rossi, and A. Knoche. Coordinating multiagent applications on the WWW: A reference architecture. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(5):362–366, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Wyckoff, S. McLaughry, T. Lehman, and D. Ford. TSpaces. IBM Systems Journal, 37(3):454–474, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Omicini and F. Zambonelli. Coordination for internet application development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 2(3):251–269, 1999. Special Issue on Coordination Mechanisms and Patterns for Web Agents.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Rowstron. WCL: A web co-ordination language. World Wide Web Journal, 1(3):167–179, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Carreria, L. Silva, and J. Silva. On the design of Eilean: A Linda-like library for MPI. Technical report, Universidade de Coimbra, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Carriero and D. Gelernter. Tuple analysis and partial evaluation strategies in the Linda precompiler. In D. Gelernter, A. Nicolau, and D. Padua, editors, Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing, Research Monographs in Parallel and Distributed Computing, pages 114–125. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. De Nicola and R. Pugliese. Linda based applicative and imperative process algebras. Theoretical Computer Science, 238(1–2):389–437, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. G.D. Plotkin. A structural approach to operational semantics. Technical Report DAIMI FN-19, Dep. of Computer Science, Aarhus University, Denmark, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. De Nicola, R. Pugliese, and A. Rowstron. Proving the correctness of optimising destructive and non-destructive reads over tuple spaces. Technical Report available at: http://music.dsi.unifi.it/, Dipartimento di Sistemi e Informatica, Univ. Firenze, 2000.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

De Nicola, R., Pugliese, R., Rowstron, A. (2000). Proving the Correctness of Optimising Destructive and Non-destructive Reads over Tuple Spaces. In: Porto, A., Roman, GC. (eds) Coordination Languages and Models. COORDINATION 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1906. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45263-X_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45263-X_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41020-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45263-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics