Skip to main content

Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Using Steady State Genetic Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2723))

Abstract

In this paper we propose two novel approaches for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems using steady state GAs. These methods are intended for solving real-world application problems that have many constraints and very small feasible regions. One method called Objective Exchange Genetic Algorithm for Design Optimization (OEGADO) runs several GAs concurrently with each GA optimizing one objective and exchanging information about its objective with the others. The other method called Objective Switching Genetic Algorithm for Design Optimization (OSGADO) runs each objective sequentially with a common population for all objectives. Empirical results in benchmark and engineering design domains are presented. A comparison between our methods and Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) shows that our methods performed better than NSGA-II for difficult problems and found Pareto-optimal solutions in fewer objective evaluations. The results suggest that our methods are better applicable for solving real-world application problems wherein the objective computation time is large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Khaled Rasheed. GADO: A genetic algorithm for continuous design optimization. Technical Report DCS-TR-352, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, January 1998. Ph.D. Thesis, http://webster.cs.uga.edu/~khaled/thesis.ps.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khaled Rasheed and Haym Hirsh. Learning to be selective in genetic-algorithm-based design optimization. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 13:157–169, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., S. Agrawal, A. Pratap, and T. Meyarivan (2000). A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI, pp.849–858.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khaled Rasheed and Haym Hirsh. Informed operators: Speeding up genetic-algorithm-based design optimization using reduced models. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO’2000), pp. 628–635, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Rasheed., S. Vattam, X. Ni. Comparison of Methods for Using Reduced Models to Speed up Design Optimization. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO’2002), pp. 1180–1187, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khaled Rasheed. An incremental-approximate-clustering approach for developing dynamic reduced models for design optimization. In Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’2002), pp. 986–993, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Rasheed., S. Vattam, X. Ni. Comparison of methods for developing dynamic reduced models for design optimization. In Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’2002), pp. 390–395, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. William H. Press, Saul A. Teukolsky, William T. Vetterling, and Brian P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes in C: the Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [England]; New York, 2nd edition, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.D. Schaffer. Multi-objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of an International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, J.J. Grefenstette, Ed., Pittsburg, PA, July 24–26 1985, pp. 93–100, sponsored by Texas Instruments and U.S. Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence (NCARAI).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Binh and Korn. MOBES: A multi-objective Evolution Strategy for constrained optimization Problems. In Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Genetic Algorithm MENDEL 1997, Brno, Czech Republic, pp.176–182.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Srinivas, N. and Deb, K. (1995). Multi-Objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation (2), 221–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka, M. (1995). GA-based decision support system for multi-criteria, optimization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-2, pp. 1556–1561.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osycza, A. and Kundu, S. (1995). A new method to solve generalized multicriteria optimization problems using the simple genetic algorithm. Structural Optimization (10). 94–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deb, K. Pratap, A. and Moitra, S. (2000). Mechanical Component Design for Multiple Objectives Using Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting GA. KanGAL Report No. 200002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ranjithan, S.R., S.K. Chetan, and H.K. Dakshina (2001). Constraint method-based evolutionary algorithm (CMEA) for multi-objective optimization. In E. Z. et al. (Ed.), Evolutionary Multi-Criteria Optimization 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1993, pp. 299–313. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., and Thiele, L. (2001). SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. Technical Report 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Crone, D. W., Knowles, J.D., and Oates, M.J. (2000). The Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization. In Schoenauer, M., Deb, K., Rudolph, g., Yao, X., Luton, E., Merelo, J.J., and Schewfel, H.-P., editors, Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, pp.839–848, Paris, France. Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 1917.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Deb. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester, UK: John Wiley, 2001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Deb. S. Gulati (2001). Design of truss-structures for minimum weight using genetic algorithms, In Journal of Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, pp.447–465, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chafekar, D., Xuan, J., Rasheed, K. (2003). Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Using Steady State Genetic Algorithms. In: Cantú-Paz, E., et al. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation — GECCO 2003. GECCO 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2723. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45105-6_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45105-6_95

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40602-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45105-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics