Advertisement

Sexual Selection of Co-operation

  • M. Afzal Upal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2723)

Abstract

Advocates of sexual selection theory have argued that various male traits, such as male co-operative behavior towards females, can evolve through female preference for mating with those males who possess that trait. This paper reports on the results of a simulation performed to test the hypothesis that female preference for mating with co-operative males can lead to an increase in the proportions of males in a population who co-operate with females. We simply model the sex differences using a single variable measuring the cost of reproduction. Our results show that even in such a simple environment there are a large number of interacting variables, which complicate the relationship between the sexual selection of co-operative males by females and the proportion of males actually co-operating with females. In fact, in most situations we modeled, sexual selection of co-operative males by females ended up causing the proportion of females that co-operate with males to increase while the proportion of males co-operating with females showed no significant increase over the random selection experiments.

Keywords

Sexual Selection Parental Investment Female Preference Game Playing Male Trait 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Co-operation, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, W. (1987) “The Evolution of Co-operation”, In Axelrod R. The Complexity of Co-operation, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, J. L. (1970) “Cooperative Breeding and Altruistic Behaviour in the Mexican Jay”. Animal Behaviour, vol. 18, pp. 366–378. 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corning, P. (1998) “The Cooperative Gene: On the Role of Synergy in Evolution”. Evolutionary Theory, vol. 11, pp. 183–207. 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Darwin, C. (1900) The Decent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Werner Company, Akron, Ohio.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Waal, F. (1982) Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MD.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dugatkin, L. (1999) Cheating Monkeys and Citizen Bees: The Nature of Cooperation in Animals and Humans. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamilton, W. (1964) The Genetic Evolution of Social Behaviour, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 7, pp. 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ikegami, T. “From Genetic Evolution to Emergence of Game Strategies”, Physica D, vol. 75, pp.310–327. 1994zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Key, C. and Aiello, L. (2000), A Prisoner’s Dilemma Model of the Evolution of Paternal Care, Folia Primatologica, vol. 71, pp. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller, (2000), The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature, Doublesday, London.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noe, R. “Alliance Formation Among Male Baboons”, In Harcourt A. & de Waal F. Coalitions and Alliances in Human and Other Animals, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 285–321.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nowak, M., May, R., and SIGMUND, K. (1995), The Arithmetics of Mutual Help, Scientific American, June 1995, pp. 50–55.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tallamy, D. (2000) Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Exclusive Paternal Care in Arthropods, Animal Behaviour, vol. 60, pp. 559–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trivers, R. (1972) “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection”. In Sexual Selection and the Decent of Man, London, Heinemann, 1972, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Afzal Upal
    • 1
  1. 1.Opal Rock TechnologiesChantilly

Personalised recommendations