AntClust: Ant Clustering and Web Usage Mining
In this paper, we propose a new ant-based clustering algorithm called AntClust. It is inspired from the chemical recognition system of ants. In this system, the continuous interactions between the nestmates generate a “Gestalt” colonial odor. Similarly, our clustering algorithm associates an object of the data set to the odor of an ant and then simulates meetings between ants. At the end, artificial ants that share a similar odor are grouped in the same nest, which provides the expected partition. We compare AntClust to the K-Means method and to the AntClass algorithm. We present new results on artificial and real data sets. We show that AntClust performs well and can extract meaningful knowledge from real Web sessions.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.A. Colorni, M. Dorigo, and V. Maniezzo, “Distributed optimization by ant colonies,” in Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life (F. Varela and P. Bourgine, eds.), pp. 134–142, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1991.Google Scholar
- 5.E. Lumer and B. Faieta, “Diversity and adaptation in populations of clustering ants,” in P. Husbands, J. Meyer, and S. W., eds., Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior: From Animals to Animats 3, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994 Cliff et al. , pp. 501–508.Google Scholar
- 6.P. Kuntz and D. Snyers, “Emergent colonization and graph partitioning,” in P. Husbands, J. Meyer, and S. W., eds., Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior: From Animals to Animats 3, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994 Cliff et al. , pp. 494–500.Google Scholar
- 7.N. Monmarché, M. Slimane, and G. Venturini, “On improving clustering in numerical databases with artificial ants,” in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (D. Floreano, J. Nicoud, and F. Mondala, eds.), (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland), pp. 626–635, Springer-Verlag, 13–17 September 1999.Google Scholar
- 8.N. Labroche, N. Monmarché, and G. Venturini, “A new clustering algorithm based on the chemical recognition system of ants,” in Proc. of 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2002), Lyon FRANCE, pp. 345–349, 2002.Google Scholar
- 9.B. Hölldobler and E. Wilson, The Ants. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1990.Google Scholar
- 11.J. Heer and E. Chi, “Mining the structure of user activity using cluster stability,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Analytics, SIAM Conference on Data Mining (Arlington VA, April 2002)., 2002.Google Scholar
- 12.T. Yan, M. Jacobsen, H. Garcia-Molina, and U. Dayal, “From user access patterns to dynamic hypertext linking,” in Proc. of 5th WWW, pp. 1007–1014, 1996.Google Scholar
- 13.J. Heer and E. Chi, “Identification of web user traffic composition using multimodal clustering and information scent,” 2001.Google Scholar
- 14.V. Estivill-Castro and J. Yang, “Categorizing visitors dynamically by fast and robust clustering of access logs,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2198, pp. 498–509, 2001.Google Scholar
- 15.D. Cliff, P. Husbands, J. Meyer, and S. W., eds., Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior: From Animals to Animats 3, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994.Google Scholar