Skip to main content

Higher Order Pushdown Automata, the Caucal Hierarchy of Graphs and Parity Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2719))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider two-player parity games played on transition graphs of higher order pushdown automata. They are “game-equivalent” to a kind of model-checking game played on graphs of the infinite hierarchy introduced recently by Caucal. Then in this hierarchy we show how to reduce a game to a graph of lower level. This leads to an effective solution and a construction of the winning strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Cachat, Symbolic strategy synthesis for games on pushdown graphs, ICALP’02, LNCS 2380, pp. 704–715, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Cachat, Uniform solution of parity games on prefix-recognizable graphs, INFINITY 2002, ENTCS 68(6), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Cachat, Two-way tree automata solving pushdown games, ch. 17 in W. THOMASAND T. WILKE eds., Automata, Logics, and Infinite Games, A Guide to Current Research, LNCS 2500, 2002 [11].

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Caucal, On infinite transition graphs having a decidable monadic theory, ICALP’96, LNCS 1099, pp. 194–205, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Caucal, On infinite terms having a decidable monadic theory, MFCS’02, LNCS 2420, pp. 165–176, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Caucal, O. Burkart, F. Moller and B. Steffen, Verification on infinite structures, Handbook of process algebra, Ch. 9, pp. 545–623, Elsevier, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Courcelle and I. Walukiewicz, Monadic second-order logic, graph converings and unfoldings of transition systems, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 92-1, pp. 35–62, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. A. Emerson and C. S. Jutla, Tree automata, mu-calculus and determinacy, FoCS’91, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 368–377, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Engelfriet, Iterated push-down automata, 15th STOC, pp. 365–373, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Esparza, D. Hansel, P. Rossmanith and S. Schwoon, Efficient algorithm for model checking pushdown systems, Technische Universität München, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Grädel, W. Thomas and T. Wilke eds., Automata, Logics, and Infinite Games, A Guide to Current Research, LNCS 2500, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Grädel and I. Walukiewicz, Guarded fixed point logic, LICS’ 99, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 45–54, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Knapik, D. Niwinski and P. UrzyczynHigher-order pushdown trees are easy, FoSSaCS’02, LNCS 2303, pp. 205–222, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. Kupferman, M. Y. Vardi and N. Piterman, Model checking linear properties of prefix-recognizable systems, CAV’02, LNCS 2404, pp. 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O. Kupferman and M. Y. Vardi, An automata-theoretic approach to reasoning about infinite-state systems, CAV’00, LNCS 1855, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Thomas, Languages, Automata, and Logic, Handbook of formal language theory, vol. III, pp. 389–455, Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Y. Vardi, Reasoning about the past with two-way automata., ICALP’98, LNCS 1443, pp. 628–641, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. Walukiewicz, Pushdown processes: games and model checking, CAV’96, LNCS 1102, pp. 62–74, 1996. Full version in Information and Computation 164, pp. 234–263, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. Walukiewicz, Monadic second order logic on tree-like structures, STACS’96, LNCS 1046, pp. 401–414. Full version in TCS 275 (2002), no. 1–2, pp. 311–346.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cachat, T. (2003). Higher Order Pushdown Automata, the Caucal Hierarchy of Graphs and Parity Games. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2719. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45061-0_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45061-0_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40493-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45061-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics