Skip to main content

A Comparison of Corporate Failure Models in Australia: Hybrid Neural Networks, Logit Models and Discriminant Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Developments in Applied Artificial Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2003)

Abstract

This study investigated whether two artificial neural networks (ANNs), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and hybrid networks using statistical and ANN approaches, can outperform traditional statistical models for predicting corporate failures in Australia one year prior to the financial distress. The results suggest that hybrid neural networks outperform all other models. Therefore, hybrid neural network model is a very promising tool for failure prediction. This supports the conclusion that for shareholders, policymakers and others interested in early warning systems, hybrid networks would be useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Warner, J.B., ‘Bankruptcy costs: some evidence’, The Journal of Finance, 32, 1997, 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jinn, T. and J. H. Nam, ‘Bankruptcy Prediction: Evidence from Korean Listed Companies during IMF Crisis’, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 11, 2000, 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ohlson, J., ‘Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy’, Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 1980, 109–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gentry, J. A., P. Newbold and D. T. Whitford, ‘Classifying bankruptcy firms with funds flow components’, Journal of Accounting Research, 1985, 146–160.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Altman, E., G.E. Pinches, and J.S Trieschmann, ‘Discriminant analysis, classification results and financially distressed property-liability insurers’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1977, 289–298.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deakin, E.B, ‘A discriminant analysis of predictors business failure’, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, 1972, 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blum, M. P., ‘Failing company discriminant analysis’, Journal of Accounting Research, 12, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Castagna, A.D., and Z.P. Matolcsy, ‘The prediction of corporate failure: testing the Australian experience’, Australian Journal of Management, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lincoln, M, ‘An empirical study of the usefulness of accounting ratios to describe levels of insolvency risk’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 7, 1984, 321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Izan, H, ‘Corporate Distress in Australia’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 8, 1984, 303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Odom, M. D. and R. Shard, ‘A Neural Network Model for Bankruptcy Prediction’, International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA, 2, 1990, 163–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coats, P. K and L. F. Fant, ‘Recognizing financial distress patterns using neural network tool’, Financial Management, 22, 1993, 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Altman E., G. Marco,. and F. Varetto, ‘Corporate distress diagnosis: Comparisons using linear discriminant analysis and neural networks (the Italian experience)’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 18, 1994, 505–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Markham, I. and C. Ragsdale, ‘Combining neural networks and statistical predictions to solve the classification problem in discriminant analysis’, Decision Sciences, 26, 1995, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Han, I., Y. Kwon, and K. C. Lee, ‘Hybrid neural network models for bankruptcy predictions’, Decision Support Systems, 18, 1996, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rumelhart, D., J. McClelland and PDP Group, Parallel distributed processing. Exploration in the Microstructure of Cognition,.1: Foundation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Norusis, M. J, ‘SPSS advanced statistics user’s guide’, SPSS, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hosmer, D. W. and S. Lemeshow, ‘Applied Logistic Regression’, John Wiley & Sons, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yim, J., Mitchell, H. (2003). A Comparison of Corporate Failure Models in Australia: Hybrid Neural Networks, Logit Models and Discriminant Analysis. In: Chung, P.W.H., Hinde, C., Ali, M. (eds) Developments in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2718. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45034-3_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45034-3_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40455-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45034-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics