Skip to main content

A Social ACL Semantics by Deontic Constraints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Multi-Agent Systems and Applications III (CEEMAS 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2691))

Abstract

In most proposals for multi-agent systems, an Agent Communication Language (ACL) is the formalism designed to express knowledge exchange among agents. However, a universally accepted standard for ACLs is still missing. Among the different approaches to the definition of ACL semantics, the social approach seems the most appropriate to express semantics of communication in open societies of autonomous and heterogeneous agents.

In this paper we propose a formalism (deontic constraints) to express social ACL semantics, which can be grounded on a computational logic framework, thus allowing automatic verification of compliance by means of appropriate proof procedures. We also show how several common communication performatives can be defined by means of deontic constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Finin, T., Labrou, Y., Mayfield, J.: KQML as an agent communication language. In: Software Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. FIPA: FIPA Communicative Act Library Specification (2001) Published on August 10th, 2001, available for download from the FIPA website: http://www.fipa.org

  3. Singh, M.: Agent communication language: rethinking the principles. IEEE Computer (1998) 40–47

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh, M.P.: A social semantics for agent communication languages. In Dignum, F., Greaves, M., eds.: Issues in Agent Communication. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (2000) 31–45

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: Operational specification of a commitment-based agent communication language. In Castelfranchi, C., Lewis Johnson, W., eds.: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2002). Part II, Bologna, Italy, ACM (2002) 535–542

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yolum, P., Singh, M.: Commitment machines. In: Intelligent Agents VIII, 8th International Workshop, ATAL 2001 Seattle, WA, USA, August 1–3, 2001 Revised Papers. Volume 2333 of LNAI., Springer Verlag (2002) 235–247

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alberti, M., Ciampolini, A., Gavanelli, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P., Torroni, P.: Logic based semantics for agent communication languages. In Dunin-Keplicz, B., Werbrugge, R., eds.: Proceedings of the Workshop of Formal Approaches to Multiagent Systems (FAMAS03), Warsaw, Poland. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Colombetti, M., Fornara, N., Verdicchio, M.: The role of institutions in multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Knowledge based and reasoning agents, VIII Convegno AI*IA 2002, Siena, Italy. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Torroni, P., Mello, P., Maudet, N., Alberti, M., Ciampolini, A., Lamma, E., Sadri, F., Toni, F.: A logic-based approach to modeling interaction among computees (preliminary report). In: UK Multi-Agent Systems (UKMAS) Annual Conference, Liverpool, UK. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue. SUNY, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reed, C.A.: Dialogue frames in agent communication. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (ICMAS98), Paris, IEEE Press (1998) 246–253

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dignum, F., Dunin-Keplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Creating collective intention through dialogue. Logic J. of the IGPL 9 (2001) 145–158

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ciampolini, A., Lamma, E., Mello, P., Torroni, P.: An operational semantic for the safe execution of tasks in a constrained multi-agent setting. In Greco, S., Leone, N., eds.: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA). Volume 2424 of LNCS., Springer Verlag (2002) 14–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alberti, M., Ciampolini, A., Gavanelli, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P., Torroni, P. (2003). A Social ACL Semantics by Deontic Constraints. In: Mařík, V., Pěchouček, M., Müller, J. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Applications III. CEEMAS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2691. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45023-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45023-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40450-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45023-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics