Skip to main content

From Social Agents to Multi-agent Systems: Preliminary Report

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2691))

Abstract

This paper presents a formal analysis of social interaction within a multi-agent system. The concept of a social agent is introduced as the elemental building block of multi-agent systems. Social agents can be individual (BDI) agents or aggregations of agents (groups). The structure of a multi-agent system and that of social agents is formally characterised in terms of roles and the relationships between them. Stability and regulation of activity in a multi-agent system and within social agents can be accounted for by means of a complex web of roles, commitments, obligations and rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Castelfranchi. Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organisations. In Proceedings of the First ICMAS Conference, pages 41–48, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Cavedon and L. Sonenberg. On social commitments, roles and preferred goals. In Proceedings of the Third ICMAS Conference, pages 80–87, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. Teamwork. Nous, 25:485–512, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Dignum, D. Kinny, and L. Sonenberg. Motivational attitudes of agents: On desires, obligations and norms. In From Theory to Practice in Multi-Agent Systems, Proceedings of the Second International CEEMAS Workshop, pages 83–92, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. Dignum, J.-J. Ch. Meyer, and H. Weigand. Towards an organizational model for agent societies using contracts. In Proceedings of the First AAMAS Conference, pages 694–695, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Dunin-Keplicz and R. Verbrugge. Collective motivational attitudes in cooperative problem solving. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop of Central and Eastern Europe on Multi-Agent Systems (CEEMAS-99), pages 22–41, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Fagin, J.Y. Halpern, Y. Moses, and M.Y. Vardi. Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Fasli. On obligations, relativised obligations and bilateral commitments. In Proceedings of the Canadian Artificial Intelligence Conference, pages 287–296, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Fasli. On commitments, roles and obligations. In From Theory to Practice in Multi-Agent Systems, Second International Workshop of Central and Eastern Europe on Multi-Agent Systems (CEEMAS-01), Revised Papers, pages 93–102, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Fasli. Heterogeneous BDI agents. Cognitive Systems Research, 4(1):1–22, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Ferber and O. Gutknecht. A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the Third ICMAS Conference, pages 128–135, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. J. Grosz and S. Kraus. Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence, 86(2):269–357, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Rao and M. Georgeff. Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In Proceedings of the Second Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 473–484, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Rao and M. Georgeff. Decision procedures for BDI logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):293–343, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Wooldridge and N.R. Jennings. The cooperative problem-solving process. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9:563–592, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Wooldridge, N.R. Jennings, and D. Kinny. The Gaia methodology for agentoriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3:285–312, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Zambonelli, N.R. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge. Organisational abstractions for the analysis and design of multi-agent systems. In P. Cinacarini and M. Wooldridge, editors, Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, pages 127–141, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fasli, M. (2003). From Social Agents to Multi-agent Systems: Preliminary Report. In: Mařík, V., Pěchouček, M., Müller, J. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Applications III. CEEMAS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2691. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45023-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45023-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40450-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45023-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics