Advertisement

What Interpretation for Probability in Physics?

  • Maria Carla Galavotti
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 574)

Abstract

Probability enters into modern science in three ways. (1) Measurement errors. This regards all of science; in physics, probability associated with errors of measurement enters—implicitly or explicitly—into all of its branches. In this sense, one can say that a probabilistic aspect is already present in classical mechanics. Indeed, the theory of errors came to completion around the end of the 18th Century,when Newtonian mechanics was at its peak. (2) The analysis of mass phenomena, like gas particles. In physics, this use of probability is linked to statistical mechanics. Here probability makes it possible to describe through mean values the behaviour of phenomena that are too complex to allow finer descriptions. In principle, these probabilities are not essential to the theory, they are needed because of the complexity of the phenomena under study, which makes a fully detailed analysis impossible. (3) Quantum mechanics. Here probability acquires a peculiar character in view of the fact of being ‘primary’ (to use an expression of Hermann Weyl),or ‘intrinsic’ to the theory (as Harold Jeffreys used to say). This is because the measurements realized on physical systems in quantum mechanics are genuinely random. On the assumption that the theory is complete, there is no way, not even in principle, of getting rid of probability.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P.S. Laplace: Théorie analytique des probabilités (Paris 1812)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P.S. Laplace: Essai philosophique sur les probabilités (Paris 1814)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. von Mises: Probability, Statistics and Truth (Allen and Unwin, London-New York 1939, second edition 1957)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Bertrand: Calcul des probabilités (Gauthier-Villars, Paris 1888)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Born: Physics in my Generation (Springer, New York 1969)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Heisenberg: The Physical Principles of Quantum Theory (Dover, New York 1949)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Heisenberg: Physics and Philosophy (Penguin Books, London 1958)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.R. Popper: ‘The Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability and the Quantum Theory’, in Observation and Interpretation ed. by S. Körner (Butterworth, London 1957) pp. 65–70Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.R. Popper: ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Probability’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 10, 25–42 (1959)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K.R. Popper: Realism and the Aim of Science (Hutchinson, London 1982)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K.R. Popper: A World of Propensities (Thoemmes, Bristol 1990).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Jeffreys: ‘The Present Position in Probability Theory’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 5, 275–289 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Jeffreys: Scientific Inference 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1973)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Jeffreys: ‘Scientific Method, Causality, and Reality’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series. 37, 61–70 (1937)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Jeffreys: Theory of Probability 3rd edition (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1967)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. de Finetti: ‘Probabilismo’, Logos (1931). English translation: ‘Probabilism’, Erkenntnis. 31, 169-233 (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. de Finetti: ‘Sul significato soggettivo della probabilitá’, Fundamenta matematicae (1931). English translation: ‘On the Subjective meaning of Probability’, in Induction and Probability ed. by P. Monari and D. Cocchi (CLUEB, Bologna 1993) pp. 291-321Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. de Finetti: ‘La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses lois subjectives’, Annales de l’Institut Poincaré. 7, 1–68 (1937). English translation: ‘Foresight: its Logical Laws, its subjective Sources’, in Studies in Subjective Probability ed. by H.E. Smokler (Wiley, New York 1964) pp. 95-158.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.C. Galavotti: ‘Antirealism in the Philosophy of Probability: Bruno de Finetti’s Subjectivism’, Erkenntnis. 31, 239–261 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.C. Galavotti: ‘Operationism, probability and Quantum mechanics’, Foundations of Science. 1, 99–118 (1995/96)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. de Finetti, Filosofia della probabilitá (Il Saggiatore, Milano 1995)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    F.P. Ramsey: The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays ed. by R. B. Braithwaite (Routledge, London 1931)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    F.P. Ramsey: Notes on Philosophy, Probability and Mathematics ed. by M.C. Galavotti (Bibliopolis, Naples 1991)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.C. Galavotti: ‘The Notion of Subjective probability in the Work of Ramsey and de Finetti’, Theoria. 57 239–259 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M.C. Galavotti: ‘F.P. Ramsey and the Notion of ‘Chance’’, in The British Tradition in the 20th Century Philosophy, Proceedings of the 17th IWS 1994 ed. by J. Hintikka and K. Puhl (Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky Vienna 1995) pp. 330–Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M.C. Galavotti: ‘Some Remarks on Objective Chance (F.P. Ramsey, K.R. Popper and N.R. Campbell)’, in Language, Quantum, Music ed. by M.L. Dalla Chiara et al. (Kluwer, Dordrecht-Boston, 1999) pp. 73–82Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Carla Galavotti
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di FilosofiaUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations