An Improved Algorithm for Generalized Comparison of Minisatellites

  • Behshad Behzadi
  • Jean-Marc Steyaert
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2676)


One of the most important objects in genetic mapping and forensic studies are minisatellites. They consist of a heterogeneous tandem array of short repeat units called variants. The evolution of minisatellites is realized by tandem duplication and tandem deletion of variants. Jeffrey et al. proposed a method to obtain the sequence of variants, called maps. Bérard and Rivals designed the first algorithm of comparison of two minisatellite maps under an evolutionary model including deletion, insertion, mutation, amplification and contraction. The complexity of this first algorithm was O(n 4) in time and O(n 3) in space where n is the size of the maps. In this paper we propose a more efficient algorithm using the same evolutionary model which is O(n 3) in time and O(n 2) in space. Our algorithm with this better efficiency can even solve generalized and more refined models.


Edit Distance Generalize Comparison Improve Algorithm Tree Representation Transformation Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bérard, S., Rivals, E.: Comparison of Minisatellites. Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology. ACM Press, (2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jobling, M.A., Bouzekri, N., Taylor, P.G.: Hypervariable digital DNA codes for human paternal lineages: MVR-PCR at the Y-specific minisatellite, MSY1(DYF155S1). Human Molecular Genetics, Vol. 7, No. 4. (1998)643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouzekri, N., Taylor, P.G., Hammer M.F, Jobling, M.A.: Novel mutation processes in the evolution of haploid minisatellites, MSY1: array homogenization without homogenization. Human Molecular Genetics, Vol. 7, No. 4. (1998)655–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jeffreys, A.J., Tamaki, K., Macleod, A., Monckton, D.G., Neil, D.L and Armour, J.A.L: Complex gene conversion events in germline mutation at human minisatellites. Nature Genetics, 6. (1994)136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brión, M., Cao, R., Salas, A., Lareu M.V., Carracedo A.: New Method to Measure Minisatellite Variant Repeat Variation in Population Genetic Studies. American Journal of Human Biology, Vol. 14.(2002) 421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elemento, O., Gascuel, O., Lefranc, M.-P.: Reconstructing the duplication history of tandemly repeated genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution,vol 19(3). (2002) 278–288Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sankoff, D. and Kruskal, J.B: Time Warps, String Edits and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison. Addison-Wesley. (1983)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crochemore, M., Landau, G. M., Ziv-Ukelson, M.: A sub-quadratic sequence alignment algorithm for unrestricted cost matrices. SODA’2002. ACM-SIAM. (2002)679–688.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Behshad Behzadi
    • 1
  • Jean-Marc Steyaert
    • 1
  1. 1.LIXEcole PolytechniquePalaiseau cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations