Skip to main content

“Poor Man” Vote with M-ary Classifiers. Application to Iris Recognition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication (AVBPA 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2688))

Abstract

Achieving good performance in biometrics requires matching the capacity of the classifier or a set of classifiers to the size of the available training set. A classifier with too many adjustable parameters (large capacity) is likely to learn the training set without dificulty but be unable to generalize properly to new patterns. If the capacity is too small, the training set might not be learned without appreciable error. There is thus advantage to control the capacity through a variety of methods involving not only the structure of the classifiers themselves, but also the property of the input space. Ths paper proposes an original non parametric method to combine optimaly multiple classifier responses. Highly favorable results have been obtained using the above method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. U. Beyer and F. Smieja. Learning from exemples, agent teams, and the concept of reflection. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Breiman. Bagging predictors. Rapport technique TR-421, Statistics Department, University of California, Berkeley, 1994.for our model.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Daugman. “high confidence visual recognition of persons by a test of statsitical independence”, IEEE Trans. PAMI, 1, Nov. 1993, pp. 148–160.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Devroye, L. Györfi and G. Lugosi. A probabilistic theory of pattern recognition, Application of Mathematics, Springer, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Drüker, C. Cortes, L. Jackel, Y. Lecun and V. Vapnik. Boosting and other ensemble methodes. Neural Computation, 6(6), pp. 1289–1301, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Efron (1979) The convex hull of a random set of points. Biometrika, 52, p331–342.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Freund, H. Seung, E. Shamir and N. Tishby. Information, prediction and query commitee. Neural Information Processing Systems, S. Hanson, J. Cowan, C. Giles ed., pp. 483–490, Denver, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Gubner. Distributed estimation and quantization. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 39(4), pp. 1456–1459, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. L.K. Hansen and P. Salamon. Neural network ensembles. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 12, pp. 993–1001, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L.K. Hansen, C. Lüsberg and P. Salamon. Ensemble methods for recognition of handwritten digits. Proc. IEEE Signal Processing Workshop, S.Y. Kung, F. Fallside, J.A. Sorensen and C.A. Kamm Ed.; Piscataway, NJ, pp. 540–549, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. I. Jordan and R.A. Jacobs. Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the EM algorithm. Neural Computation, 6, pp. 181–214, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A.K. Jain. Fundamentals of digital image processing, Prentice-Hall Inc., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Kallel, M. Cottrell and V. Vigneron. Bootstrap for neural model selection. Proc. of the 8th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges, 22–24 Avril, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Kittler and M. Hatef. Improving recognition rates by classifier combination. Proc. IWFHR’96, pp. 81–101, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.N. Kolmogorov and S.V. Fomin. Elements of the theory of functions and functional analysis, Vol. 1, Graylock Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.P. Nadal, R. Legault et C. Suen. Complementary algorithms for the recognition of totally unconstrained handwritten numerals. 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 443–446, Atlantic cit, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. S. Oh, J. S. Lee and C.Y. Suen. Analysis of class separation and combination of class dependent features for handwriting recognition, IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 21(10), pp. 1099–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Hyvärinen, J. Karhunen and E. Oja. Independent component analysis, John Wiley & Sons, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Pearl, D. Geiger and T. Verma. Conditional independence and its representations. Kybernetika, 25(2), 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B.D. Ripley. Pattern recognition and neural networks, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. M. Soares, C. L. Fróes da Silva, M. De Gregorio and F.M.G. França. A software implmentation of the WISARD classifier, Proceeding of Brasilian Symposium on Artificial Neural Network, Belo Horizonte, MG, december 9–11, 1998, vol. II, 225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. Tumer and J. Ghosh. A framework for estimating performance improvements in hybrid pattern classifiers. Proc. World Congress on Neural Networks, San Diego, pp. 220–225, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. G. Valiant. A theory of the learnable. Communications of the association for computing machinery, 27, pp. 1134–1142, reprint in Shavlik & Dietterich, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Wolpert. Stacked regression. Neural Networks, 5(2), pp. 241–260, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vigneron, V., Maaref, H., Lelandais, S. (2003). “Poor Man” Vote with M-ary Classifiers. Application to Iris Recognition. In: Kittler, J., Nixon, M.S. (eds) Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication. AVBPA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2688. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44887-X_76

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44887-X_76

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40302-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44887-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics