Advertisement

A Comparative Study of Automatic Face Verification Algorithms on the BANCA Database

  • M. Sadeghi
  • J. Kittler
  • A. Kostin
  • K. Messer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2688)

Abstract

The performance of different face identity verification methods on BANCA database is compared. As part of the comparison, we investigate the effect of representation on different approaches to face verification. Two conventional dimensionality reduction methods, namely the Principal Component Analysis and the Linear Discriminant Analysis are studied as well as the use of the raw image space. The results of the comparison show that when the training set size is limited, a better performance is achieved using Normalised Correlation method in the LDA space while Support Vector Machine classifier is superior when a large enough training set is available. Moreover, the SVM is almost insensitive to the choice of representation. However, a dimensionality reduction can be beneficial if constraints on the size of the template are imposed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    P. Belhumeur, J. Hespanha, and D. Kriegman. Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence, 19(7):711–720, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    O. Deniz, M. Castrillon, and M. Hernandez. Face recognition using independent component analysis and support vector machines. In AVBPA, pages 59–64, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Hamouz, J. Kittler, J. Kamarainen, and H. Kälviäinen. Hypotheses-driven affine invariant localization of faces in verification systems. In Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Audio-and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication, Guildford, UK, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. Jonsson, J. Kittler, Y. Li, and J. Matas. Support vector machines for face authentication. In T. Pridmore and D. Elliman, editors, Proceedings of BMVC’99, pages 543–553, 1999., 1999.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Kostin, M. Sadeghi, J. Kittler, and K. Messer. On representation spaces for SVM based face verification. In The Advent of Biometrics on the Internet, A COST 275 Workshop, Rome, Italy, 7–8 November, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. Liu and H. Wechsler. Comparative assessment of independent component analysis. In Proc. the 2nd International Conference on Audioand Video-based Biometric Person Authentication, Washington D. C., March 22–24, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. Messer, J. Matas, J. Kittler, J. Luettin, and G. Maitre. Xm2vtsdb: The extended m2vts database. In Second International Conference on Audio and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication, March 1999.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Turk and A. Pentland. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 3(1), 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Sadeghi
    • 1
  • J. Kittler
    • 1
  • A. Kostin
    • 1
  • K. Messer
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing, School of Electronics and Physical SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations