Skip to main content

Residuals in Higher-Order Rewriting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2706))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 324 Accesses

Abstract

Residuals have been studied for various forms of rewriting and residual systems have been defined to capture residuals in an abstract setting. In this article we study residuals in orthogonal Pattern Rewriting Systems (PRSs). First, the rewrite relation is defined by means of a higher-order rewriting logic, and proof terms are defined that witness reductions. Then, we have the formal machinery to define a residual operator for PRSs, and we will prove that an orthogonal PRS together with the residual operator mentioned above, is a residual system. As a side-effect, all results of (abstract)residual theory are inherited by orthogonal PRSs, such as confluence, and the notion of permutation equivalence of reductions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnaby P. Hilken. Towards a proof theory of rewriting: The simply typed 2λ-calculus. Theoretical Computer Science, 170:407–444, 1996.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Gérard Huet. Residual theory in λ-calculus: A formal development. Journal of Functional Programming, 4(3):371–394, 1994.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gérard Huet and Jean-Jacques Lévy. Computations in orthogonal rewriting systems, part I + II. In J.L. Lassez and G.D. Plotkin, editors, Computational Logic — Essays in Honor of Alan Robinson. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zurab Khasidashvili and John Glauert. Relating conflict-free stable transition systems and event models via redex families. Theoretical Computer Science, 286(1):65–95, 2002.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cosimo Laneve and Ugo Montanari. Axiomatizing permutation equivalence. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 6(3):219–215, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Jean-Jacques Lévy. Réductions correctes et optimales dans le λ-calcul. Thèse de doctorat d’état, Université Paris VII, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richard Mayr and Tobias Nipkow. Higher-order rewrite systems and their confluence. Theoretical Computer Science, 192:3–29, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Paul-André Melliès. Axiomatic rewriting theory VI: Residual theory revisited. In Sophie Tison, editor, 13th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications, pages 24–50, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. José Meseguer. Conditional rewriting logic as a unified model of concurrency. Theoretical Computer Science, 96:73–155, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Dale Miller. A logic programming language with lambda-abstraction, function variables, and simple unification. Journal of Logic and Computation, 1(4), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tobias Nipkow and Christian Prehofer. Higher-order rewriting and equational reasoning. In W. Bibel and P. Schmitt, editors, Automated Deduction — A Basis. for Applications, Volume I: Foundations, number 8 in Applied Logic Series, pages 399–430. Kluwer Academic Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vincent van Oostrom. Confluence for Abstract and Higher-Order Rewriting. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent van Oostrom and Roel de Vrijer. Equivalence of Reductions, chapter 8 of [18]. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vincent van Oostrom and Roel de Vrijer. Four equivalent equivalences of reductions. In Proceedings of WRS’02 (ENTCS 70.6), 2003. Downloadable at: http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/entcs/.

  15. Femke van Raamsdonk. Confluence and Normalisation for Higher-Order Rewriting. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Femke van Raamsdonk. Higher-order rewriting. In 10th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eugene W. Stark. Concurrent transition systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 64(3):221–269, 1989.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Terese. Term Rewriting Systems. Number 55 in Camb. Tracts in Theor. Comp. Sc. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. A. Wolfram. The Clausal Theory of Types. Number 21 in Camb. Tracts in Theor. Comp. Sc. Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bruggink, H.J.S. (2003). Residuals in Higher-Order Rewriting. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (eds) Rewriting Techniques and Applications. RTA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2706. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44881-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44881-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40254-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44881-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics