Skip to main content

An Empirical Comparison of Training Algorithms for Radial Basis Functions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Nets Problem Solving Methods (IWANN 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2687))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we present a review and comparison of five different algorithms for training a RBF network. The algorithms are compared using nine databases. Our results show that the simplest algorithm, k-means clustering, may be the best alternative. The results of RBF are also compared with the results of Multilayer Feedforward with Backpropagation, the performance of a RBF network trained with k-means clustering is slightly better and the computational cost considerably lower. So we think that RBF may be a better alternative.

This work was supported by a Proyect of Generalitat Valenciana number GV01-14

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McLoone, S., Brown, M., Irwin, G., Lightbody, G., “A Hybrid Linear/Nonlinear Training Algorithm for Feedforward Neural Networks”, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 9, no. 4 pp. 669–684, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Krayiannis, N., “Reformulated Radial Basis Neural Networks Trained by Gradient Descent”, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 657–671, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moody, J., Darken, C.J., “Fast Learning in Networks of Locally-Tuned Procesing Units”, Neural Computation, vol. 1, pp. 281–294, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Musavi, M.T., Ahmed, W., Chan, K.H., Faris, K.B., Hummels, D.M., “On the Training of Radial Basis Function Classifiers”, Neural Networks, vol. 5, pp. 595–603, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy, A., Govil, S., et alt. “A Neural-Network Learning Theory and Polynomial Time RBF Algorithm”, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1301–1313, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang, Y., Bang, S., “An Efficient Method to Construct a Radial Basis Function Neural Network Classifier”, Neural Network, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1495–1503, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roy, A., Govil, S., et alt., “An Algorithm to Generate Radial Basis Function (RBF)-Like Nets for Classification Problems”, Neural Networks, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 179–201, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ortiz-Gómez, M., Hernández-Espinosa, C., Fernández-Redondo, M. (2003). An Empirical Comparison of Training Algorithms for Radial Basis Functions. In: Mira, J., Álvarez, J.R. (eds) Artificial Neural Nets Problem Solving Methods. IWANN 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2687. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44869-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44869-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40211-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44869-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics